Refine code-block rendering and editing to the Craft reference #9

Open
opened 2026-09-13 13:34:41 +00:00 by kayg · 84 comments
Owner

Request and current status

Craft references exist; requested code-block presentation/interaction refinement remains incomplete.

Acceptance

Audit syntax colors, language controls, code surface, line numbers and wrapping. Preserve exact code/indentation/blank lines/undo. Verify long lines, paste, selection, empty blocks, resize and multiple languages in actual native UI.

Keep open until the user-facing outcome is verified in a delivered build. Source review or a successful build alone is not completion.

## Request and current status Craft references exist; requested code-block presentation/interaction refinement remains incomplete. ## Acceptance Audit syntax colors, language controls, code surface, line numbers and wrapping. Preserve exact code/indentation/blank lines/undo. Verify long lines, paste, selection, empty blocks, resize and multiple languages in actual native UI. Keep open until the user-facing outcome is verified in a delivered build. Source review or a successful build alone is not completion.
Author
Owner

Role: task agent (read-only audit)
Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-overnight-combined at 9153c4beda
State: audited; no files changed and no build/runtime claim made.

Concrete audit against current code and Craft acceptance artifacts:

  • Implemented: MarkdownBlockDocument parses fencedCode(language:); MarkdownProjection.renderFencedCode applies a monospace font, text color, separator-derived background, and paragraph style while preserving source ranges. Empty fenced bodies get an atomic placeholder. Tests cover fenced-code parsing and source/display mapping.
  • Missing: there is no code-specific editor surface, language picker/control, syntax token coloring, line-number gutter, or explicit wrap toggle. Fenced language is parsed but discarded from presentation attributes. Long lines use the normal NSTextView layout path; no code-only horizontal-scroll/wrap policy exists. No dedicated code-block UI/behavior tests cover paste, selection, empty blocks, resize, long lines, or multiple languages.

Smallest implementation plan (after editor owner's current work):

  1. Add a code presentation descriptor in Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift or a new CodeBlockPresentation.swift, carrying language, wrap mode, and line-number visibility without changing canonical Markdown. Keep source/display mapping and undo in MarkdownBlockDocument unchanged.
  2. Add a narrow AppKit layout/gutter seam around the existing NSTextView (new CodeBlockGutterView.swift plus the existing editor host integration) to draw line numbers from visible fenced-code line fragments. Do not create per-line views or a second document model.
  3. Add native language/wrap controls at the existing editor block adornment/inspector seam, with state owned by the session/editor presentation layer. Language changes must be explicitly non-destructive unless a future syntax grammar is approved.
  4. Add focused tests in Tests/CalternalEditorTests/MarkdownBlockDocumentTests.swift for exact fenced source preservation, indentation/blank lines, empty fences, paste/selection, and multiple language labels; add geometry tests for long lines, resize and line-number alignment.

Dependencies/order: source-preserving projection descriptor first; gutter/layout second; controls last. The current drag/handle owner must not be edited by this slice. Runtime acceptance requires build-host tests and one VM scenario covering long lines, paste, empty blocks, resize and multiple languages in actual native UI. Risk: no syntax grammar or Craft timing is present in screenshots, so syntax colors/language behavior need product approval before implementation; avoid inventing grammar or rewriting Markdown.

Role: task agent (read-only audit) Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-overnight-combined at 9153c4beda1d32b3e65b29f6d1a32f65453cfd4c State: audited; no files changed and no build/runtime claim made. Concrete audit against current code and Craft acceptance artifacts: - Implemented: MarkdownBlockDocument parses `fencedCode(language:)`; MarkdownProjection.renderFencedCode applies a monospace font, text color, separator-derived background, and paragraph style while preserving source ranges. Empty fenced bodies get an atomic placeholder. Tests cover fenced-code parsing and source/display mapping. - Missing: there is no code-specific editor surface, language picker/control, syntax token coloring, line-number gutter, or explicit wrap toggle. Fenced language is parsed but discarded from presentation attributes. Long lines use the normal NSTextView layout path; no code-only horizontal-scroll/wrap policy exists. No dedicated code-block UI/behavior tests cover paste, selection, empty blocks, resize, long lines, or multiple languages. Smallest implementation plan (after editor owner's current work): 1. Add a code presentation descriptor in `Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift` or a new `CodeBlockPresentation.swift`, carrying language, wrap mode, and line-number visibility without changing canonical Markdown. Keep source/display mapping and undo in MarkdownBlockDocument unchanged. 2. Add a narrow AppKit layout/gutter seam around the existing NSTextView (new `CodeBlockGutterView.swift` plus the existing editor host integration) to draw line numbers from visible fenced-code line fragments. Do not create per-line views or a second document model. 3. Add native language/wrap controls at the existing editor block adornment/inspector seam, with state owned by the session/editor presentation layer. Language changes must be explicitly non-destructive unless a future syntax grammar is approved. 4. Add focused tests in `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/MarkdownBlockDocumentTests.swift` for exact fenced source preservation, indentation/blank lines, empty fences, paste/selection, and multiple language labels; add geometry tests for long lines, resize and line-number alignment. Dependencies/order: source-preserving projection descriptor first; gutter/layout second; controls last. The current drag/handle owner must not be edited by this slice. Runtime acceptance requires build-host tests and one VM scenario covering long lines, paste, empty blocks, resize and multiple languages in actual native UI. Risk: no syntax grammar or Craft timing is present in screenshots, so syntax colors/language behavior need product approval before implementation; avoid inventing grammar or rewriting Markdown.
Author
Owner

Correction to the earlier audit: the central worktree is now at fb4c66d5956379f3218d84a7a4fd4037ecc608e2 (clean at audit time), not the historical 9153c4be cited above. I rechecked the current source. The #9 findings remain materially unchanged: fenced-code parsing, monospace/background projection, empty-fence handling, and source/display preservation are present; language controls, syntax token coloring, line-number gutter, explicit wrapping policy, and dedicated code-block UI coverage are absent. No implementation or runtime claim is being made from the historical revision.

Correction to the earlier audit: the central worktree is now at `fb4c66d5956379f3218d84a7a4fd4037ecc608e2` (clean at audit time), not the historical `9153c4be` cited above. I rechecked the current source. The #9 findings remain materially unchanged: fenced-code parsing, monospace/background projection, empty-fence handling, and source/display preservation are present; language controls, syntax token coloring, line-number gutter, explicit wrapping policy, and dedicated code-block UI coverage are absent. No implementation or runtime claim is being made from the historical revision.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree .worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: planned, before implementation. Base is integration revision 9e3a64b6. Root checkout remains untouched.

Scope: audit and refine only fenced-code projection/renderer behavior in Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift plus focused projection tests if an existing test target covers this path. Preserve canonical Markdown bytes, whitespace/blank lines, copy/undo/selection mappings, language metadata, and incremental projection boundaries. No edits to BlockEditorView, NoteEditorSession, inspector/sidebar/title parser code.

Plan: (1) compare current renderer with .worktrees/editor-code-performance-preview history and design guidance; (2) make the smallest native AppKit projection change for readable code surface, language/gutter/wrap behavior while retaining source mapping; (3) add only focused regression coverage for exact source/display mapping and long/empty/multilanguage fenced blocks; (4) inspect diff and hand off exact candidate to root for reviewer then QA. No local Swift build; root owns agents@mbp build and VM UI verification.

Assumptions: the current integration revision is the intended base; visual proof remains in .agents/design-guidance and issue comments. Renderer attributes are presentation-only and source ranges remain authoritative.

Risks/follow-up: AppKit layout/gutter affordances may require a separate view-layer owner if projection-only changes cannot supply them without touching BlockEditorView; in that case I will leave the renderer-safe candidate and record the gap rather than widen scope.

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree `.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: planned, before implementation. Base is integration revision `9e3a64b6`. Root checkout remains untouched. Scope: audit and refine only fenced-code projection/renderer behavior in `Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift` plus focused projection tests if an existing test target covers this path. Preserve canonical Markdown bytes, whitespace/blank lines, copy/undo/selection mappings, language metadata, and incremental projection boundaries. No edits to `BlockEditorView`, `NoteEditorSession`, inspector/sidebar/title parser code. Plan: (1) compare current renderer with `.worktrees/editor-code-performance-preview` history and design guidance; (2) make the smallest native AppKit projection change for readable code surface, language/gutter/wrap behavior while retaining source mapping; (3) add only focused regression coverage for exact source/display mapping and long/empty/multilanguage fenced blocks; (4) inspect diff and hand off exact candidate to root for reviewer then QA. No local Swift build; root owns agents@mbp build and VM UI verification. Assumptions: the current integration revision is the intended base; visual proof remains in `.agents/design-guidance` and issue comments. Renderer attributes are presentation-only and source ranges remain authoritative. Risks/follow-up: AppKit layout/gutter affordances may require a separate view-layer owner if projection-only changes cannot supply them without touching `BlockEditorView`; in that case I will leave the renderer-safe candidate and record the gap rather than widen scope.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree .worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: implemented candidate, ready for reviewer -> QA. Commit: 86d672f8 (Polish fenced code projection presentation).

Concrete changes:

  • Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift: fenced blocks now carry normalized language metadata, bounded syntax highlighting runs, monospaced code paragraph attributes, logical line numbers/start/end metadata, gutter width and body indentation metadata, and safe empty/EOF anchors. Existing source/display mapping remains one-to-one for visible code runs; CRLF/CR insertion endings are preserved.
  • Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift: focused projection regressions cover fence-byte preservation, Unicode/source mapping, language-specific colors and fallbacks, bounded highlighting, empty/bare fence undo, and trailing-EOF anchors. The native surface-paint test from the historical preview was intentionally excluded because BlockEditorView.swift is outside this worker’s ownership.

Rationale: reuse the prior proven projection implementation from historical commits 21d79560 and 243fa520, but retain only renderer/projection and focused tests. This makes the candidate safe to integrate alongside the separate native painter work without touching editor/session/inspector/sidebar/title-parser code.

Assumptions: root integration remains based on 9e3a64b6; root owns agents@mbp builds and VM UI verification. No local Swift build was run per assignment.

Risks/follow-up: line-number/gutter metadata is inert until the corresponding native BlockEditorView painter is integrated by its owner; this candidate alone proves projection semantics and syntax colors, not visible gutter/surface painting. Actual long-line resize, paste, selection, and UI screenshots remain unverified here and require root’s reviewer/QA/build path.

Validation: git diff --cached --check passed before commit; source diff is limited to the two listed files. Build/test execution intentionally deferred to root build owner.

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree `.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: implemented candidate, ready for reviewer -> QA. Commit: `86d672f8` (`Polish fenced code projection presentation`). Concrete changes: - `Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift`: fenced blocks now carry normalized language metadata, bounded syntax highlighting runs, monospaced code paragraph attributes, logical line numbers/start/end metadata, gutter width and body indentation metadata, and safe empty/EOF anchors. Existing source/display mapping remains one-to-one for visible code runs; CRLF/CR insertion endings are preserved. - `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`: focused projection regressions cover fence-byte preservation, Unicode/source mapping, language-specific colors and fallbacks, bounded highlighting, empty/bare fence undo, and trailing-EOF anchors. The native surface-paint test from the historical preview was intentionally excluded because `BlockEditorView.swift` is outside this worker’s ownership. Rationale: reuse the prior proven projection implementation from historical commits `21d79560` and `243fa520`, but retain only renderer/projection and focused tests. This makes the candidate safe to integrate alongside the separate native painter work without touching editor/session/inspector/sidebar/title-parser code. Assumptions: root integration remains based on `9e3a64b6`; root owns agents@mbp builds and VM UI verification. No local Swift build was run per assignment. Risks/follow-up: line-number/gutter metadata is inert until the corresponding native `BlockEditorView` painter is integrated by its owner; this candidate alone proves projection semantics and syntax colors, not visible gutter/surface painting. Actual long-line resize, paste, selection, and UI screenshots remain unverified here and require root’s reviewer/QA/build path. Validation: `git diff --cached --check` passed before commit; source diff is limited to the two listed files. Build/test execution intentionally deferred to root build owner.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium
Worktree/branch: .worktrees/code-block-polish / wave16/code-block-polish
Reviewed revision: 86d672f8acf5c564b8c093c094660b82ca126e58
State: source review REJECTED; no build or native UI verification performed.

P2 — Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift:1159-1174: the patch removes the previous code background, reserves roughly 46 pt for a gutter, and publishes code-surface/line-number attributes, but BlockEditorView.MarkdownLayoutFragment does not consume those attributes. The product would show indented code with a blank gutter, no line numbers, and no code surface. This regresses the existing visible background and does not meet the issue's production presentation scope. Fix narrowly in the existing MarkdownLayoutFragment: detect code attributes per realized fragment, compute a finite span from the live text container, include it in renderingSurfaceBounds, draw a semantic code surface before super.draw, then draw that fragment's line number after glyphs. Preserve the existing list/horizontal-rule paths and avoid document scans. Add one mounted TextKit regression for visible surface/number geometry across wrap, resize, empty and EOF lines.

P2 — Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift:1655-1698: C-like and Ruby keyword regexes are case-insensitive, although those languages' identifiers/keywords are case-sensitive. Ordinary identifiers such as Class, TRUE, or Return will be colored as keywords. Keep case-insensitive matching only for grammars that permit it (SQL here), and add negative casing assertions.

The plan-review step was recorded before implementation, but its stated risk materialized: the worker intentionally stopped at projection metadata because BlockEditorView.swift was outside ownership. That produces inert UI metadata and a visual regression, so ownership needs the bounded painter expansion before integration.

Source/display mapping, Unicode ranges, CRLF/CR insertion endings, empty/bare/EOF anchors, and the 32 KiB/256-line highlighting cutoffs were inspected and look bounded. Selection/paste behavior, actual TextKit drawing, resize, colors, and performance remain unverified because this was read-only source review.

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium Worktree/branch: `.worktrees/code-block-polish` / `wave16/code-block-polish` Reviewed revision: `86d672f8acf5c564b8c093c094660b82ca126e58` State: source review REJECTED; no build or native UI verification performed. P2 — `Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift:1159-1174`: the patch removes the previous code background, reserves roughly 46 pt for a gutter, and publishes code-surface/line-number attributes, but `BlockEditorView.MarkdownLayoutFragment` does not consume those attributes. The product would show indented code with a blank gutter, no line numbers, and no code surface. This regresses the existing visible background and does not meet the issue's production presentation scope. Fix narrowly in the existing `MarkdownLayoutFragment`: detect code attributes per realized fragment, compute a finite span from the live text container, include it in `renderingSurfaceBounds`, draw a semantic code surface before `super.draw`, then draw that fragment's line number after glyphs. Preserve the existing list/horizontal-rule paths and avoid document scans. Add one mounted TextKit regression for visible surface/number geometry across wrap, resize, empty and EOF lines. P2 — `Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift:1655-1698`: C-like and Ruby keyword regexes are case-insensitive, although those languages' identifiers/keywords are case-sensitive. Ordinary identifiers such as `Class`, `TRUE`, or `Return` will be colored as keywords. Keep case-insensitive matching only for grammars that permit it (SQL here), and add negative casing assertions. The plan-review step was recorded before implementation, but its stated risk materialized: the worker intentionally stopped at projection metadata because `BlockEditorView.swift` was outside ownership. That produces inert UI metadata and a visual regression, so ownership needs the bounded painter expansion before integration. Source/display mapping, Unicode ranges, CRLF/CR insertion endings, empty/bare/EOF anchors, and the 32 KiB/256-line highlighting cutoffs were inspected and look bounded. Selection/paste behavior, actual TextKit drawing, resize, colors, and performance remain unverified because this was read-only source review.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree .worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: revised plan after review rejection of 86d672f8; no patch applied yet.

Scope: extend only the existing MarkdownLayoutFragment painter in Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift. Consume existing projection code attributes to draw a native code surface and logical line numbers. Keep changes inside renderingSurfaceBounds and draw(at:in:) plus narrowly required private helpers; do not touch mouse/image/focus/performance methods or add custom controls. Also correct the existing C-like and Ruby keyword regexes in Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift to be case-sensitive, with negative identifier coverage.

Implementation plan: (1) derive code geometry from realized fragment code attributes and finite live text-container/content span; (2) include surface extents in renderingSurfaceBounds without changing non-code fragments or creating blank gutter/background; (3) paint the semantic rounded surface before super.draw, then paint one number per logical source line after text using line attributes, skipping soft-wrap continuations and zero-width placeholders safely; (4) add focused negative keyword tests and inspect diff. No local Swift build.

Assumptions: 86d672f8 is the current candidate base; root will run reviewer then QA and own agents@mbp build/UI verification. Existing projection attributes and MarkdownCodeBlockLayout constants are authoritative.

Risks/follow-up: TextKit fragment geometry varies while layout is incomplete; all live spans must be finite and bounded, with safe fallback to superclass bounds and no drawing. Visible acceptance of resize/empty/long code remains root’s UI responsibility.

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree `.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: revised plan after review rejection of `86d672f8`; no patch applied yet. Scope: extend only the existing `MarkdownLayoutFragment` painter in `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift`. Consume existing projection code attributes to draw a native code surface and logical line numbers. Keep changes inside `renderingSurfaceBounds` and `draw(at:in:)` plus narrowly required private helpers; do not touch mouse/image/focus/performance methods or add custom controls. Also correct the existing C-like and Ruby keyword regexes in `Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift` to be case-sensitive, with negative identifier coverage. Implementation plan: (1) derive code geometry from realized fragment code attributes and finite live text-container/content span; (2) include surface extents in `renderingSurfaceBounds` without changing non-code fragments or creating blank gutter/background; (3) paint the semantic rounded surface before `super.draw`, then paint one number per logical source line after text using line attributes, skipping soft-wrap continuations and zero-width placeholders safely; (4) add focused negative keyword tests and inspect diff. No local Swift build. Assumptions: `86d672f8` is the current candidate base; root will run reviewer then QA and own agents@mbp build/UI verification. Existing projection attributes and `MarkdownCodeBlockLayout` constants are authoritative. Risks/follow-up: TextKit fragment geometry varies while layout is incomplete; all live spans must be finite and bounded, with safe fallback to superclass bounds and no drawing. Visible acceptance of resize/empty/long code remains root’s UI responsibility.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree .worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: revised painter candidate ready for reviewer -> QA. Commits: 86d672f8 (projection baseline), 7f561769 (Paint fenced code surfaces and line numbers).

Concrete changes:

  • Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift: existing MarkdownLayoutFragment now derives finite live code geometry from realized codeBlock/gutter attributes and the current TextKit container, expands rendering bounds only for code surfaces, paints the bounded semantic rounded surface before super.draw, and paints one monospaced logical line number after text while skipping soft-wrap continuations. No mouse, image, focus, or performance methods changed; no controls added.
  • Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift: C-like and Ruby keyword regexes are case-sensitive, matching their language semantics.
  • Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift: added negative mixed-case keyword fallback checks for Swift and Ruby.

Rationale: consume the existing projection metadata in the native fragment painter so gutter/surface presentation is real and resize-aware while keeping source bytes and selection mappings in the projection layer.

Assumptions: root integration remains based on 9e3a64b6; the two commits are cumulative and should be cherry-picked together. No local Swift build was run per assignment.

Risks/follow-up: native AppKit rendering and resize behavior remain unverified until root’s agents@mbp build and VM QA. Geometry fails closed when TextKit reports non-finite/incomplete state, preventing blank gutter/background artifacts. The surface uses a rounded path for each realized code fragment; reviewer should confirm multi-fragment visual continuity.

Validation: git diff --check passed before commit; changed files are limited to the existing code renderer/projection and focused test file.

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree `.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: revised painter candidate ready for reviewer -> QA. Commits: `86d672f8` (projection baseline), `7f561769` (`Paint fenced code surfaces and line numbers`). Concrete changes: - `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift`: existing `MarkdownLayoutFragment` now derives finite live code geometry from realized `codeBlock`/gutter attributes and the current TextKit container, expands rendering bounds only for code surfaces, paints the bounded semantic rounded surface before `super.draw`, and paints one monospaced logical line number after text while skipping soft-wrap continuations. No mouse, image, focus, or performance methods changed; no controls added. - `Sources/CalternalEditor/MarkdownProjection.swift`: C-like and Ruby keyword regexes are case-sensitive, matching their language semantics. - `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`: added negative mixed-case keyword fallback checks for Swift and Ruby. Rationale: consume the existing projection metadata in the native fragment painter so gutter/surface presentation is real and resize-aware while keeping source bytes and selection mappings in the projection layer. Assumptions: root integration remains based on `9e3a64b6`; the two commits are cumulative and should be cherry-picked together. No local Swift build was run per assignment. Risks/follow-up: native AppKit rendering and resize behavior remain unverified until root’s agents@mbp build and VM QA. Geometry fails closed when TextKit reports non-finite/incomplete state, preventing blank gutter/background artifacts. The surface uses a rounded path for each realized code fragment; reviewer should confirm multi-fragment visual continuity. Validation: `git diff --check` passed before commit; changed files are limited to the existing code renderer/projection and focused test file.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium
Worktree/branch: .worktrees/code-block-polish / wave16/code-block-polish
Reviewed revision: 7f561769751e436138456d00c77be2efcf191f4a atop 86d672f8
State: repair source review REJECTED; no build or native UI verification performed.

P2 — Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift, drawCodeSurface(at:in:) in the new painter: every layout fragment is drawn with a fully rounded rectangle even when codeBoundaryFlags == (false, false). A multi-line fence therefore paints middle logical lines as separate rounded pills with internal corner cutouts; first-only and last-only fragments also round both ends. Draw middle fragments as square continuous rows and round only the code block's exterior top and bottom corners. A selective-corner path or equivalent overlapping-cap construction is sufficient; keep the existing per-realized-fragment geometry and bounds.

P2 — Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift: this repair adds only nine lines of projection/color assertions. It still has no mounted TextKit/drawing regression, so the new codeSurfaceGeometry, renderingSurfaceBounds, draw ordering, line-number placement, wrapping/resize behavior, empty/EOF surface, and multi-fragment seam continuity are untested. Add the requested mounted BlockEditorView regression before integration.

The case-sensitive keyword correction is sound. The painter runs only through realized layout fragments and performs bounded fragment-local work; finite geometry checks and surface-before-super.draw ordering look appropriate. Source/display mapping, Unicode, CRLF/CR, and EOF-anchor behavior remain plausible from source review.

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium Worktree/branch: `.worktrees/code-block-polish` / `wave16/code-block-polish` Reviewed revision: `7f561769751e436138456d00c77be2efcf191f4a` atop `86d672f8` State: repair source review REJECTED; no build or native UI verification performed. P2 — `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift`, `drawCodeSurface(at:in:)` in the new painter: every layout fragment is drawn with a fully rounded rectangle even when `codeBoundaryFlags == (false, false)`. A multi-line fence therefore paints middle logical lines as separate rounded pills with internal corner cutouts; first-only and last-only fragments also round both ends. Draw middle fragments as square continuous rows and round only the code block's exterior top and bottom corners. A selective-corner path or equivalent overlapping-cap construction is sufficient; keep the existing per-realized-fragment geometry and bounds. P2 — `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`: this repair adds only nine lines of projection/color assertions. It still has no mounted TextKit/drawing regression, so the new `codeSurfaceGeometry`, `renderingSurfaceBounds`, draw ordering, line-number placement, wrapping/resize behavior, empty/EOF surface, and multi-fragment seam continuity are untested. Add the requested mounted `BlockEditorView` regression before integration. The case-sensitive keyword correction is sound. The painter runs only through realized layout fragments and performs bounded fragment-local work; finite geometry checks and surface-before-`super.draw` ordering look appropriate. Source/display mapping, Unicode, CRLF/CR, and EOF-anchor behavior remain plausible from source review.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree .worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: P2 review follow-up implemented, ready for re-review. New commit: 761aea5a (Close code surface edges and add mounted regression), cumulative with 86d672f8 and 7f561769.

Changes:

  • Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift: replaced per-fragment fully-rounded code pills with a path whose first/last fragment edges receive outer rounding and internal edges remain square, eliminating seams. Geometry remains finite/live and fails closed.
  • Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift: restored one focused mounted native AppKit test that lays out a narrow long fenced block, checks soft-wrap and logical-line metadata, checks expanded surface bounds, renders to NSBitmapImageRep, and verifies the painted surface pixel.

Validation: git diff --check passed; no local Swift build per assignment. Root owns actual build and runtime verification.

Assumptions/risks: test runs in a native window fixture and may require VM display setup; line-number and surface behavior still needs root QA across resize, empty/EOF, and multiple languages. No unrelated editor methods or controls changed.

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree `.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: P2 review follow-up implemented, ready for re-review. New commit: `761aea5a` (`Close code surface edges and add mounted regression`), cumulative with `86d672f8` and `7f561769`. Changes: - `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift`: replaced per-fragment fully-rounded code pills with a path whose first/last fragment edges receive outer rounding and internal edges remain square, eliminating seams. Geometry remains finite/live and fails closed. - `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`: restored one focused mounted native AppKit test that lays out a narrow long fenced block, checks soft-wrap and logical-line metadata, checks expanded surface bounds, renders to `NSBitmapImageRep`, and verifies the painted surface pixel. Validation: `git diff --check` passed; no local Swift build per assignment. Root owns actual build and runtime verification. Assumptions/risks: test runs in a native window fixture and may require VM display setup; line-number and surface behavior still needs root QA across resize, empty/EOF, and multiple languages. No unrelated editor methods or controls changed.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium
Worktree/branch: .worktrees/code-block-polish / wave16/code-block-polish
Reviewed revision: 761aea5a2a08e04016b73623c42335a4584f2c2e
State: source repair remains REJECTED for the mounted regression; no build or UI run.

The selective-corner production repair is sound: middle fragments receive square edges, first/last fragments round only the exterior edge, drawing precedes glyphs, and work remains finite and fragment-local.

P2 — Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:151-190: the mounted test contains one logical code line that soft-wraps, so it generally exercises one NSTextLayoutFragment carrying both first and last flags. It never creates or samples an internal boundary between logical-line fragments. The sole bitmap assertion samples one top pixel and checks only redComponent < 0.99; normal editor/window backgrounds can satisfy this even if the code surface or line numbers are absent. It proves neither seam continuity nor gutter ink.

Fix the regression with at least three logical code lines/fragments. Resolve adjacent fragment frames and compare pixels immediately above/on/below their shared edges in an otherwise empty part of the surface against the resolved code-surface color and outside background. Scan the expected gutter-number rectangles for contrasting ink, while retaining a wrapped line and proving its continuation adds no duplicate number. Exercise resize bounds plus empty/EOF surface as previously requested.

No further production-source blocker was found in this delta.

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium Worktree/branch: `.worktrees/code-block-polish` / `wave16/code-block-polish` Reviewed revision: `761aea5a2a08e04016b73623c42335a4584f2c2e` State: source repair remains REJECTED for the mounted regression; no build or UI run. The selective-corner production repair is sound: middle fragments receive square edges, first/last fragments round only the exterior edge, drawing precedes glyphs, and work remains finite and fragment-local. P2 — `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:151-190`: the mounted test contains one logical code line that soft-wraps, so it generally exercises one `NSTextLayoutFragment` carrying both first and last flags. It never creates or samples an internal boundary between logical-line fragments. The sole bitmap assertion samples one top pixel and checks only `redComponent < 0.99`; normal editor/window backgrounds can satisfy this even if the code surface or line numbers are absent. It proves neither seam continuity nor gutter ink. Fix the regression with at least three logical code lines/fragments. Resolve adjacent fragment frames and compare pixels immediately above/on/below their shared edges in an otherwise empty part of the surface against the resolved code-surface color and outside background. Scan the expected gutter-number rectangles for contrasting ink, while retaining a wrapped line and proving its continuation adds no duplicate number. Exercise resize bounds plus empty/EOF surface as previously requested. No further production-source blocker was found in this delta.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree .worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: mounted-test follow-up implemented, ready for exact re-review. New commit: e9fcacd8 (Strengthen mounted code painter regression), cumulative with 86d672f8, 7f561769, and 761aea5a.

Changes:

  • Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift: the existing mounted native test now uses three logical code lines with a long wrapped first line, verifies multiple logical starts, compares an interior surface pixel against outside editor background, scans each expected gutter rectangle for line-number ink, checks empty-fence EOF projection, and resizes the mounted editor before rechecking bounded surface width. It remains one focused mounted regression.

Validation: git diff --check passed; no local Swift build per assignment. Root owns native build/runtime execution.

Assumptions/risks: bitmap coordinates follow the existing TextKit fixture transform; root QA should confirm the display fixture on the VM and review any pixel-threshold sensitivity. Production painter logic was unchanged in this follow-up.

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree `.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: mounted-test follow-up implemented, ready for exact re-review. New commit: `e9fcacd8` (`Strengthen mounted code painter regression`), cumulative with `86d672f8`, `7f561769`, and `761aea5a`. Changes: - `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`: the existing mounted native test now uses three logical code lines with a long wrapped first line, verifies multiple logical starts, compares an interior surface pixel against outside editor background, scans each expected gutter rectangle for line-number ink, checks empty-fence EOF projection, and resizes the mounted editor before rechecking bounded surface width. It remains one focused mounted regression. Validation: `git diff --check` passed; no local Swift build per assignment. Root owns native build/runtime execution. Assumptions/risks: bitmap coordinates follow the existing TextKit fixture transform; root QA should confirm the display fixture on the VM and review any pixel-threshold sensitivity. Production painter logic was unchanged in this follow-up.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium
Worktree/branch: .worktrees/code-block-polish / wave16/code-block-polish
Reviewed revision: e9fcacd8e554b17d593a663b2d8099bab6cfba5c
State: strengthened-test source review REJECTED; production painter remains source-PASS. No build/runtime execution performed.

P2 — Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:163-222: the test asks for one layout fragment at document location zero, then expects that fragment to contain three line fragments whose relative characterRange.location == 0. TextKit layout fragments are paragraph-scoped; the first fragment represents the wrapped first logical line, while the two return paragraphs require their own layout fragments. The assertion is therefore based on the wrong geometry boundary and is likely to fail at runtime.

Several assertions also do not prove their labels:

  • gutterInkSamples >= 3 counts contrasting bitmap rows, so one rendered digit can contribute three or more samples; it does not prove one number for each logical line.
  • No pixel at an internal boundary between two code layout fragments is sampled, so seam continuity remains untested.
  • The empty document is only projected; it is never mounted or rendered, so empty/EOF surface painting remains untested.
  • Resize reuses the fragment captured before resizing and checks only width <= 360; the original approximately 220-point width already passes, even if no relayout occurs.

Fix by enumerating all code layout fragments from the content range and keeping each fragment with its view-space frame. Assert exactly three logical starts and that only the first contains soft-wrap continuations. For each adjacent fragment, sample immediately above/on/below the shared edge at a common empty-surface X. Count a per-fragment gutter-ink boolean rather than scan rows. Mount/render the empty and trailing-EOF cases. After resizing, reacquire fragments and assert the surface endpoint follows the new live content width and increases from the initial value within a small tolerance.

The selective-corner path and production geometry remain bounded and source-correct from review. Build is the next gate only after the test is repaired; no runtime claim follows from this source review.

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium Worktree/branch: `.worktrees/code-block-polish` / `wave16/code-block-polish` Reviewed revision: `e9fcacd8e554b17d593a663b2d8099bab6cfba5c` State: strengthened-test source review REJECTED; production painter remains source-PASS. No build/runtime execution performed. P2 — `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:163-222`: the test asks for one layout fragment at document location zero, then expects that fragment to contain three line fragments whose relative `characterRange.location == 0`. TextKit layout fragments are paragraph-scoped; the first fragment represents the wrapped first logical line, while the two `return` paragraphs require their own layout fragments. The assertion is therefore based on the wrong geometry boundary and is likely to fail at runtime. Several assertions also do not prove their labels: - `gutterInkSamples >= 3` counts contrasting bitmap rows, so one rendered digit can contribute three or more samples; it does not prove one number for each logical line. - No pixel at an internal boundary between two code layout fragments is sampled, so seam continuity remains untested. - The empty document is only projected; it is never mounted or rendered, so empty/EOF surface painting remains untested. - Resize reuses the fragment captured before resizing and checks only `width <= 360`; the original approximately 220-point width already passes, even if no relayout occurs. Fix by enumerating all code layout fragments from the content range and keeping each fragment with its view-space frame. Assert exactly three logical starts and that only the first contains soft-wrap continuations. For each adjacent fragment, sample immediately above/on/below the shared edge at a common empty-surface X. Count a per-fragment gutter-ink boolean rather than scan rows. Mount/render the empty and trailing-EOF cases. After resizing, reacquire fragments and assert the surface endpoint follows the new live content width and increases from the initial value within a small tolerance. The selective-corner path and production geometry remain bounded and source-correct from review. Build is the next gate only after the test is repaired; no runtime claim follows from this source review.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree .worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: mounted regression corrected per review; ready for exact re-review. New commit: f69d07e9 (Enumerate mounted code fragments in regression), cumulative with 86d672f8, 7f561769, 761aea5a, and e9fcacd8.

Changes: the existing single mounted test now enumerates all realized TextKit fragments and reacquires them after resize. It requires exactly three logical starts across fragments, verifies wrapped lines, scans gutter rectangles per logical fragment for ink, compares interior and every adjacent-fragment join against the resolved semantic surface blend and outside background, mounts/draws an actual empty EOF block, and checks the resized surface endpoint tracks the wider container. No production logic changed.

Validation: git diff --check passed; no local Swift build per assignment. Root owns build/runtime verification.

Assumptions/risks: the test relies on the existing native fixture’s coordinate transform and AppKit display availability; root should run it on the configured VM and adjust only if platform rasterization makes the thresholds unstable.

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree `.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: mounted regression corrected per review; ready for exact re-review. New commit: `f69d07e9` (`Enumerate mounted code fragments in regression`), cumulative with `86d672f8`, `7f561769`, `761aea5a`, and `e9fcacd8`. Changes: the existing single mounted test now enumerates all realized TextKit fragments and reacquires them after resize. It requires exactly three logical starts across fragments, verifies wrapped lines, scans gutter rectangles per logical fragment for ink, compares interior and every adjacent-fragment join against the resolved semantic surface blend and outside background, mounts/draws an actual empty EOF block, and checks the resized surface endpoint tracks the wider container. No production logic changed. Validation: `git diff --check` passed; no local Swift build per assignment. Root owns build/runtime verification. Assumptions/risks: the test relies on the existing native fixture’s coordinate transform and AppKit display availability; root should run it on the configured VM and adjust only if platform rasterization makes the thresholds unstable.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium
Worktree/branch: .worktrees/code-block-polish / wave16/code-block-polish
Reviewed revision: f69d07e9c8c42be445499bd8089e8dbe426cb19d
State: test repair remains REJECTED for two assertion gaps; production painter remains source-PASS. No build/runtime execution performed.

P2 — Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:229-248: the claimed per-fragment gutter proof still increments gutterInkSamples once for every contrasting scan row. A single line-number glyph normally occupies several rows and can satisfy >= 3 even when the second and third numbers are missing. For each logical-start row, compute one hasInk boolean over its expected gutter rectangle and assert it; also assert exactly three logical rows were tested. Include fragment.layoutFragmentFrame.minX in the view-space gutter/body X conversion.

P2 — Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:266-272: resize now reacquires fragments, but newWidth > oldWidth and maxX <= 360 do not establish that the painted endpoint follows the live text-container content edge. Assert the relevant surface's view-space max X equals textContainerOrigin.x + textContainer.size.width - lineFragmentPadding - surfaceInset within a 1–2 point tolerance before and after resize, and that its delta follows the width change.

P3 reliability — codeFragments() reads attributed-string index zero inside contains without first requiring length > 0. Add the same length guard already used in the subsequent flattening closure so an empty TextKit line fragment cannot trigger an out-of-bounds attribute lookup.

The fragment enumeration and exactly-three logical-start assertion now use the appropriate TextKit boundary. The bitmap join samples meaningfully cross adjacent layout-fragment edges and compare against the resolved semantic surface color. The empty fence is now mounted and its expanded rendering bounds are checked. A build is required after these small test repairs; this source review is not runtime evidence.

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium Worktree/branch: `.worktrees/code-block-polish` / `wave16/code-block-polish` Reviewed revision: `f69d07e9c8c42be445499bd8089e8dbe426cb19d` State: test repair remains REJECTED for two assertion gaps; production painter remains source-PASS. No build/runtime execution performed. P2 — `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:229-248`: the claimed per-fragment gutter proof still increments `gutterInkSamples` once for every contrasting scan row. A single line-number glyph normally occupies several rows and can satisfy `>= 3` even when the second and third numbers are missing. For each logical-start row, compute one `hasInk` boolean over its expected gutter rectangle and assert it; also assert exactly three logical rows were tested. Include `fragment.layoutFragmentFrame.minX` in the view-space gutter/body X conversion. P2 — `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:266-272`: resize now reacquires fragments, but `newWidth > oldWidth` and `maxX <= 360` do not establish that the painted endpoint follows the live text-container content edge. Assert the relevant surface's view-space max X equals `textContainerOrigin.x + textContainer.size.width - lineFragmentPadding - surfaceInset` within a 1–2 point tolerance before and after resize, and that its delta follows the width change. P3 reliability — `codeFragments()` reads attributed-string index zero inside `contains` without first requiring `length > 0`. Add the same length guard already used in the subsequent flattening closure so an empty TextKit line fragment cannot trigger an out-of-bounds attribute lookup. The fragment enumeration and exactly-three logical-start assertion now use the appropriate TextKit boundary. The bitmap join samples meaningfully cross adjacent layout-fragment edges and compare against the resolved semantic surface color. The empty fence is now mounted and its expanded rendering bounds are checked. A build is required after these small test repairs; this source review is not runtime evidence.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree .worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: final mounted-test precision follow-up implemented, ready for re-review. New commit: 3802b11d (Make mounted code painter assertions fragment precise), cumulative with prior candidate commits.

Changes: the existing mounted regression now guards attributed-string indexing, enumerates every realized code fragment, tests exactly three logical rows with an independent gutter-ink assertion per row, includes each fragment’s layout-frame origin in bitmap coordinates, samples every adjacent join against the resolved semantic surface blend and outside background, mounts/draws the empty EOF block, and checks every relevant surface endpoint against the live text-container endpoint before and after resize with 2 px tolerance.

Validation: git diff --check passed; no local Swift build per assignment. Root owns build/runtime verification.

Assumptions/risks: pixel thresholds and TextKit fragment realization remain VM-dependent; production code is unchanged in this follow-up. Root reviewer should inspect the exact fixture once more before QA.

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree `.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: final mounted-test precision follow-up implemented, ready for re-review. New commit: `3802b11d` (`Make mounted code painter assertions fragment precise`), cumulative with prior candidate commits. Changes: the existing mounted regression now guards attributed-string indexing, enumerates every realized code fragment, tests exactly three logical rows with an independent gutter-ink assertion per row, includes each fragment’s layout-frame origin in bitmap coordinates, samples every adjacent join against the resolved semantic surface blend and outside background, mounts/draws the empty EOF block, and checks every relevant surface endpoint against the live text-container endpoint before and after resize with 2 px tolerance. Validation: `git diff --check` passed; no local Swift build per assignment. Root owns build/runtime verification. Assumptions/risks: pixel thresholds and TextKit fragment realization remain VM-dependent; production code is unchanged in this follow-up. Root reviewer should inspect the exact fixture once more before QA.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium
Worktree/branch: .worktrees/code-block-polish / wave16/code-block-polish
Reviewed exact cumulative revision: 3802b11d213e094d33fcacb30e9e961f077fc31d
State: SOURCE PASS. No local build or native runtime execution performed.

The final test correction resolves the recorded findings:

  • Empty attributed line fragments are guarded before index-zero attribute access.
  • The mounted fixture enumerates all code layout fragments and requires exactly three logical starts while retaining a wrapped continuation.
  • Each logical-start row independently must contain gutter ink, using that fragment's view-space X/Y origin; one glyph can no longer satisfy all three lines by contributing several scan rows.
  • Each initial and reacquired post-resize fragment endpoint is compared with the finite live text-container content endpoint within a two-point tolerance.
  • Adjacent fragment joins sample the semantic surface color immediately across the boundary and distinguish it from the outside background.
  • The empty fenced placeholder is mounted and its exterior rendering-bound expansion is asserted.

The cumulative production changes remain source-PASS: syntax work is bounded, keyword matching respects case-sensitive grammars, code surfaces draw before glyphs, only exterior block corners round, line numbers draw once per logical line, and geometry stays fragment-local with finite bounds.

Next gate: exact-tip Swift 6.3 build and focused mounted test execution. Source review does not establish native rendering, appearance, resizing, selection/paste, or performance behavior. Keep issue #9 open through build, VM UI verification, delivery, and user acceptance.

Reviewer: ui_fixes_review_medium Worktree/branch: `.worktrees/code-block-polish` / `wave16/code-block-polish` Reviewed exact cumulative revision: `3802b11d213e094d33fcacb30e9e961f077fc31d` State: SOURCE PASS. No local build or native runtime execution performed. The final test correction resolves the recorded findings: - Empty attributed line fragments are guarded before index-zero attribute access. - The mounted fixture enumerates all code layout fragments and requires exactly three logical starts while retaining a wrapped continuation. - Each logical-start row independently must contain gutter ink, using that fragment's view-space X/Y origin; one glyph can no longer satisfy all three lines by contributing several scan rows. - Each initial and reacquired post-resize fragment endpoint is compared with the finite live text-container content endpoint within a two-point tolerance. - Adjacent fragment joins sample the semantic surface color immediately across the boundary and distinguish it from the outside background. - The empty fenced placeholder is mounted and its exterior rendering-bound expansion is asserted. The cumulative production changes remain source-PASS: syntax work is bounded, keyword matching respects case-sensitive grammars, code surfaces draw before glyphs, only exterior block corners round, line numbers draw once per logical line, and geometry stays fragment-local with finite bounds. Next gate: exact-tip Swift 6.3 build and focused mounted test execution. Source review does not establish native rendering, appearance, resizing, selection/paste, or performance behavior. Keep issue #9 open through build, VM UI verification, delivery, and user acceptance.
Author
Owner

Combined integration candidate — worker /root/block_drag_finish

  • Worktree: .worktrees/editor-structural-combined
  • Branch: wave16/editor-structural-combined
  • Base: exact 26eb155253241603ec8f1a89e263a7a8cd496341
  • Combined tip: f99ed4f28ae3b21beb87e4a99c4bf4a05acaaae8
  • Integrated issue #9 commits: 88ea9f0d, 59f25ce9, d3973350, 8645d919, 521a5945, 97398231 (reviewed original delta 9e3a64b6..3802b11d)

All cherry-picks were conflict-free. Per-file numstats exactly match the reviewed #9 delta: BlockEditorView 187+/2-, MarkdownProjection 388+/17-, CodeBlockPresentationTests 322+/0-. Stable patch IDs match for commits 2–6. The first patch differs only in context because base 26eb already carries title projection's leadingLineIsTitle argument; the integrated default render path preserves that argument while the fenced-code path uses the reviewed code renderer. Exact interaction review of title projection, fragment painting, paste reveal, and list selection is active.

No local build or GUI run. Focused selector: CalternalEditorTests.CodeBlockPresentationTests/testMountedCodePainterWrapsAndPaintsSurface (plus the remaining tests in CodeBlockPresentationTests).

Combined integration candidate — worker `/root/block_drag_finish` - Worktree: `.worktrees/editor-structural-combined` - Branch: `wave16/editor-structural-combined` - Base: exact `26eb155253241603ec8f1a89e263a7a8cd496341` - Combined tip: `f99ed4f28ae3b21beb87e4a99c4bf4a05acaaae8` - Integrated issue #9 commits: `88ea9f0d`, `59f25ce9`, `d3973350`, `8645d919`, `521a5945`, `97398231` (reviewed original delta `9e3a64b6..3802b11d`) All cherry-picks were conflict-free. Per-file numstats exactly match the reviewed #9 delta: BlockEditorView 187+/2-, MarkdownProjection 388+/17-, CodeBlockPresentationTests 322+/0-. Stable patch IDs match for commits 2–6. The first patch differs only in context because base 26eb already carries title projection's `leadingLineIsTitle` argument; the integrated default render path preserves that argument while the fenced-code path uses the reviewed code renderer. Exact interaction review of title projection, fragment painting, paste reveal, and list selection is active. No local build or GUI run. Focused selector: `CalternalEditorTests.CodeBlockPresentationTests/testMountedCodePainterWrapsAndPaintsSurface` (plus the remaining tests in `CodeBlockPresentationTests`).
Author
Owner

Source integration review — exact combined tip 5f8dd69e029e63d5c87e68d4b5e663b63684ef52 against base 26eb155253241603ec8f1a89e263a7a8cd496341: PASS (no P1–P3 findings).

The six #9 commits preserve the reviewed code-presentation delta; commits 2–6 are exact by range-diff, and the first differs only to carry the base title-projection flag through the ordinary line renderer. Fenced-code blocks still dispatch directly to renderFencedCode, so the first-line title treatment cannot style code. The shared TextKit fragment subclass retains existing list/divider painting and adds code painting only when the fragment resolves to a fenced-code block with code attributes. Mounted tests cover multiple realized fragments, wraps, joins, resize, gutters, and empty fences.

This is a source-only integration verdict. Compile and rendered-app evidence remain with the build/QA lanes.

Source integration review — exact combined tip `5f8dd69e029e63d5c87e68d4b5e663b63684ef52` against base `26eb155253241603ec8f1a89e263a7a8cd496341`: **PASS (no P1–P3 findings)**. The six #9 commits preserve the reviewed code-presentation delta; commits 2–6 are exact by range-diff, and the first differs only to carry the base title-projection flag through the ordinary line renderer. Fenced-code blocks still dispatch directly to `renderFencedCode`, so the first-line title treatment cannot style code. The shared TextKit fragment subclass retains existing list/divider painting and adds code painting only when the fragment resolves to a fenced-code block with code attributes. Mounted tests cover multiple realized fragments, wraps, joins, resize, gutters, and empty fences. This is a source-only integration verdict. Compile and rendered-app evidence remain with the build/QA lanes.
Author
Owner

Root fast-forwarded the clean preview integration branch from26eb1552 to exact5f8dd69e after independent combined source review PASS and diff-check. Includes code-block presentation, atomic disjoint list indentation, native-paste reveal coalescing, and hover lifecycle/footer-width correction. The known roughly7pt visible text/mentions alignment gap remains for native measurement. This is a NEXT build candidate; it does not supersede the current26eb event/title build and is not installed. No runtime/performance acceptance is claimed.

Root fast-forwarded the clean preview integration branch from26eb1552 to exact5f8dd69e after independent combined source review PASS and diff-check. Includes code-block presentation, atomic disjoint list indentation, native-paste reveal coalescing, and hover lifecycle/footer-width correction. The known roughly7pt visible text/mentions alignment gap remains for native measurement. This is a NEXT build candidate; it does not supersede the current26eb event/title build and is not installed. No runtime/performance acceptance is claimed.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree .worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: compile-fix candidate ready for re-review. Commit: f0f77e65 (Resolve code surface colors with AppKit appearance), atop 3802b11d and prior cumulative commits.

Changes:

  • Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift: replaced unsupported NSColor.resolvedColor(with:) calls with AppKit NSAppearance.performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance, preserving dynamic semantic color resolution in the existing code-surface provider.
  • Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift: resolved the expected semantic surface blend through the same AppKit appearance context; no shim or fake extension added.

Validation: git diff --check passed. This directly addresses the reported compile errors at the painter color provider and mounted-test color expectation. No local build run; root owns agents@mbp build/runtime verification.

Assumptions/risks: AppKit’s current drawing appearance is the supported native mechanism for resolving dynamic NSColor values on this SDK. The production drawing algorithm and test scope are otherwise unchanged.

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree `.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: compile-fix candidate ready for re-review. Commit: `f0f77e65` (`Resolve code surface colors with AppKit appearance`), atop `3802b11d` and prior cumulative commits. Changes: - `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift`: replaced unsupported `NSColor.resolvedColor(with:)` calls with AppKit `NSAppearance.performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance`, preserving dynamic semantic color resolution in the existing code-surface provider. - `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`: resolved the expected semantic surface blend through the same AppKit appearance context; no shim or fake extension added. Validation: `git diff --check` passed. This directly addresses the reported compile errors at the painter color provider and mounted-test color expectation. No local build run; root owns agents@mbp build/runtime verification. Assumptions/risks: AppKit’s current drawing appearance is the supported native mechanism for resolving dynamic NSColor values on this SDK. The production drawing algorithm and test scope are otherwise unchanged.
Author
Owner

Exact central 5f8dd69e029e63d5c87e68d4b5e663b63684ef52 build-host discovery result:

  • Source integration was reviewer-passed. Immutable export verified tree 8ef3e6ca3d4aa8856d084d0c83ef1d70c92e03f3, 263 inputs, archive SHA-256 29ad9ff6f76bdc25932077f62e3d72aee24402103ac0840d1fb2fee1448a290f, manifest SHA-256 a8b6f987f6d77646c6e7bce7636a4d36c7c7d765cc479668c4f1fd5d8978a267. The extra input versus 26eb is Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift.
  • SwiftPM Release test compile failed in 4.655s before tests: Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift:7444:58: error: value of type 'NSColor' has no member 'resolvedColor'. Adjacent lines 7445-7446 use the same unavailable member for the other semantic colors.
  • Exact compile log: /Users/agents/Developer/BuildOnly/package-tests-d40/Evidence/package-tests/20260913T154953Z-central-5f8dd69e-code-list-hover-1d82888f/swift-build.log, SHA-256 eff73d6e1cdd24b73777ba946f70e7ddd0af6aa15f0ac7f729b15441cf9028e2.
  • No code-presentation selector executed, no runtime was staged, and no Release build was attempted. This is a compile failure, not a test failure or runtime result.
Exact central `5f8dd69e029e63d5c87e68d4b5e663b63684ef52` build-host discovery result: - Source integration was reviewer-passed. Immutable export verified tree `8ef3e6ca3d4aa8856d084d0c83ef1d70c92e03f3`, 263 inputs, archive SHA-256 `29ad9ff6f76bdc25932077f62e3d72aee24402103ac0840d1fb2fee1448a290f`, manifest SHA-256 `a8b6f987f6d77646c6e7bce7636a4d36c7c7d765cc479668c4f1fd5d8978a267`. The extra input versus 26eb is `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`. - SwiftPM Release test compile failed in 4.655s before tests: `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift:7444:58: error: value of type 'NSColor' has no member 'resolvedColor'`. Adjacent lines 7445-7446 use the same unavailable member for the other semantic colors. - Exact compile log: `/Users/agents/Developer/BuildOnly/package-tests-d40/Evidence/package-tests/20260913T154953Z-central-5f8dd69e-code-list-hover-1d82888f/swift-build.log`, SHA-256 `eff73d6e1cdd24b73777ba946f70e7ddd0af6aa15f0ac7f729b15441cf9028e2`. - No code-presentation selector executed, no runtime was staged, and no Release build was attempted. This is a compile failure, not a test failure or runtime result.
Author
Owner

Reviewer source gate — exact f0f77e65282f61199bf7c24ac71a7abff94f461d atop 3802b11d213e094d33fcacb30e9e961f077fc31d: PASS (no P1–P3 findings).

The repair uses the available synchronous NSAppearance.performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance API to resolve AppKit semantic colors while the requested appearance is current. The closure restores appearance state on exit; the blended result is retained outside it. Production and the mounted regression compute the same surface recipe under the same explicit appearance, so the test continues to validate the actual semantic color rather than changing its expectation. This also matches an existing repository pattern in WindowBackdrop.syncFill.

Scope verified: two files only, git diff --check clean. Source/API review only; no build or runtime claim. A build remains required to prove the original compiler failure is cleared on the target Xcode/AppKit toolchain.

Reviewer source gate — exact `f0f77e65282f61199bf7c24ac71a7abff94f461d` atop `3802b11d213e094d33fcacb30e9e961f077fc31d`: **PASS** (no P1–P3 findings). The repair uses the available synchronous `NSAppearance.performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance` API to resolve AppKit semantic colors while the requested appearance is current. The closure restores appearance state on exit; the blended result is retained outside it. Production and the mounted regression compute the same surface recipe under the same explicit appearance, so the test continues to validate the actual semantic color rather than changing its expectation. This also matches an existing repository pattern in `WindowBackdrop.syncFill`. Scope verified: two files only, `git diff --check` clean. Source/API review only; no build or runtime claim. A build remains required to prove the original compiler failure is cleared on the target Xcode/AppKit toolchain.
Author
Owner

Integrated build status for exact central 3e8818608b7981a0670d229f322985f3474dbe58:

  • Reviewer-passed f0 color repair is integrated; immutable source export verified tree 86a3f6e9498e1947d7fe1f8652de0996ab7e709d, 263 inputs, archive SHA-256 ea047197e3445b0c913bb338442fcbcbadc6b0c2842481a77184cf7a655fbeca, manifest SHA-256 b763d2fd9acb5ae3adebef35ab0226d5eaaebe2b742a458d31183bc66230140f.
  • The prior unavailable NSColor.resolvedColor(with:) error is gone.
  • SwiftPM Release test compile still fails before tests with four Swift 6.3 isolation errors: BlockEditorView.swift:7603 reports sending context and self to main-actor drawCodeSurface(at:in:) risks data races; line 7607 reports the same two errors for drawCodeLineNumbers(at:in:).
  • Compile log: /Users/agents/Developer/BuildOnly/package-tests-d40/Evidence/package-tests/20260913T155842Z-central-3e881860-code-list-fix-f21d46f9/swift-build.log, SHA-256 721021244ff02c0e42e0b50b4d8a6df8c907d46a436acb1723317dcf8ca4e335.
  • Tests executed: 0. Runtime staged: no. Release attempted: no. This is a compile failure, not a code-presentation test result.
Integrated build status for exact central `3e8818608b7981a0670d229f322985f3474dbe58`: - Reviewer-passed `f0` color repair is integrated; immutable source export verified tree `86a3f6e9498e1947d7fe1f8652de0996ab7e709d`, 263 inputs, archive SHA-256 `ea047197e3445b0c913bb338442fcbcbadc6b0c2842481a77184cf7a655fbeca`, manifest SHA-256 `b763d2fd9acb5ae3adebef35ab0226d5eaaebe2b742a458d31183bc66230140f`. - The prior unavailable `NSColor.resolvedColor(with:)` error is gone. - SwiftPM Release test compile still fails before tests with four Swift 6.3 isolation errors: `BlockEditorView.swift:7603` reports sending `context` and `self` to main-actor `drawCodeSurface(at:in:)` risks data races; line 7607 reports the same two errors for `drawCodeLineNumbers(at:in:)`. - Compile log: `/Users/agents/Developer/BuildOnly/package-tests-d40/Evidence/package-tests/20260913T155842Z-central-3e881860-code-list-fix-f21d46f9/swift-build.log`, SHA-256 `721021244ff02c0e42e0b50b4d8a6df8c907d46a436acb1723317dcf8ca4e335`. - Tests executed: 0. Runtime staged: no. Release attempted: no. This is a compile failure, not a code-presentation test result.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree .worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: draw-isolation compile follow-up implemented, ready for re-review. Commit: 096a2725 (Make code painter helpers draw-safe), atop f0f77e65 and prior cumulative commits.

Changes: the code-surface geometry, boundary, path, surface, and line-number helpers called by AppKit’s nonisolated NSTextLayoutFragment.draw(at:in:) override are now explicitly nonisolated. They use immutable TextKit draw-time geometry and local numeric metrics, and resolve semantic colors through NSAppearance.currentDrawing().performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance. Actor-isolated MarkdownCodeBlockLayout constants and static color properties are no longer captured by these helpers. No unchecked/unsafe isolation suppression or shim was added.

Validation: git diff --check passed. No local build per assignment; root owns agents@mbp compiler verification. The reported send context/self to main actor-isolated method call sites are removed.

Assumptions/risks: AppKit’s NSAppearance.currentDrawing() plus performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance is the supported draw-time dynamic color path. If the SDK flags stored block access from the nonisolated geometry property, the next narrow fix should make the immutable MarkdownBlock property explicitly nonisolated; no production behavior needs widening.

Worker/role: code-block-polish task agent; owned worktree `.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: draw-isolation compile follow-up implemented, ready for re-review. Commit: `096a2725` (`Make code painter helpers draw-safe`), atop `f0f77e65` and prior cumulative commits. Changes: the code-surface geometry, boundary, path, surface, and line-number helpers called by AppKit’s nonisolated `NSTextLayoutFragment.draw(at:in:)` override are now explicitly nonisolated. They use immutable TextKit draw-time geometry and local numeric metrics, and resolve semantic colors through `NSAppearance.currentDrawing().performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance`. Actor-isolated `MarkdownCodeBlockLayout` constants and static color properties are no longer captured by these helpers. No unchecked/unsafe isolation suppression or shim was added. Validation: `git diff --check` passed. No local build per assignment; root owns agents@mbp compiler verification. The reported `send context/self to main actor-isolated method` call sites are removed. Assumptions/risks: AppKit’s `NSAppearance.currentDrawing()` plus `performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance` is the supported draw-time dynamic color path. If the SDK flags stored `block` access from the nonisolated geometry property, the next narrow fix should make the immutable `MarkdownBlock` property explicitly nonisolated; no production behavior needs widening.
Author
Owner

Reviewer source gate — exact 096a2725294a8a6b90fab571511aa5ce8455201f atop f0f77e65282f61199bf7c24ac71a7abff94f461d: FAIL.

P1 — nonisolated geometry still reads an explicitly MainActor-isolated constant

  1. Location: Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift:7058, inside MarkdownLayoutFragment.codeSurfaceGeometry.
  2. What breaks: Swift 6.3 compilation can still fail because the newly nonisolated property reads MarkdownCodeBlockLayout.surfaceInset.
  3. Why likely: MarkdownCodeBlockLayout is explicitly declared @MainActor in MarkdownProjection.swift:1627. This patch replaced its other draw-path constants with local scalar values specifically to cross the nonisolated NSTextLayoutFragment.draw(at:in:) boundary, but this one access remains. It is the same isolation category the commit is intended to repair.
  4. Scoped fix: replace this final access with the identical local 8 value, or preferably mark only the pure scalar geometry constants/helpers in MarkdownCodeBlockLayout as nonisolated and keep using the shared definitions. The latter avoids the new duplicated 28/72/10/8/9/5/100_000 values drifting from projection layout.

The rest of the callback audit is structurally sound: block is an immutable Sendable value; fragment geometry and attributed-line metadata are callback-local; Core Graphics path/state operations use the supplied context; NSAppearance.currentDrawing() is the public current drawing appearance and performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance scopes/restores it synchronously; line-number font/color/string drawing creates local values and retains no cross-thread mutable state. No assumeIsolated suppression was introduced.

Scope checked: one product file; git diff --check passes. Source/API review only; no build or runtime claim. Re-review only a corrected frozen SHA.

Reviewer source gate — exact `096a2725294a8a6b90fab571511aa5ce8455201f` atop `f0f77e65282f61199bf7c24ac71a7abff94f461d`: **FAIL**. ### P1 — nonisolated geometry still reads an explicitly MainActor-isolated constant 1. **Location:** `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift:7058`, inside `MarkdownLayoutFragment.codeSurfaceGeometry`. 2. **What breaks:** Swift 6.3 compilation can still fail because the newly `nonisolated` property reads `MarkdownCodeBlockLayout.surfaceInset`. 3. **Why likely:** `MarkdownCodeBlockLayout` is explicitly declared `@MainActor` in `MarkdownProjection.swift:1627`. This patch replaced its other draw-path constants with local scalar values specifically to cross the nonisolated `NSTextLayoutFragment.draw(at:in:)` boundary, but this one access remains. It is the same isolation category the commit is intended to repair. 4. **Scoped fix:** replace this final access with the identical local `8` value, or preferably mark only the pure scalar geometry constants/helpers in `MarkdownCodeBlockLayout` as `nonisolated` and keep using the shared definitions. The latter avoids the new duplicated `28/72/10/8/9/5/100_000` values drifting from projection layout. The rest of the callback audit is structurally sound: `block` is an immutable `Sendable` value; fragment geometry and attributed-line metadata are callback-local; Core Graphics path/state operations use the supplied context; `NSAppearance.currentDrawing()` is the public current drawing appearance and `performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance` scopes/restores it synchronously; line-number font/color/string drawing creates local values and retains no cross-thread mutable state. No `assumeIsolated` suppression was introduced. Scope checked: one product file; `git diff --check` passes. Source/API review only; no build or runtime claim. Re-review only a corrected frozen SHA.
Author
Owner

Execution blocker: multiple implementation/reviewer agents stopped with Codex usage-limit errors. No further source or runtime acceptance is claimed. Desktop26eb1552 is installed and native launch/prior note verified. Central3e881860 contains next editor changes but is compile-blocked on nonisolated code painter helpers; isolated096a2725 repair is awaiting mandatory reviewer. Source-approved candidates pending combined integration: cross-event1fb74e92 (three-commit chain), imagecontrolsabb397be, chrome net27bd..a969f8ef. Event test cleanupd745 is integrated but shared XCTest async-teardown abort remains under investigation; title owner needs exact pre-feature-control PID52796 crash stack before choosing test-only fix. Layout centered760pt cap remains settled, exact alignment still pending. Preserve all active worktrees and uncommitted work; resume from these issues, do not restart or claim completion.

Execution blocker: multiple implementation/reviewer agents stopped with Codex usage-limit errors. No further source or runtime acceptance is claimed. Desktop26eb1552 is installed and native launch/prior note verified. Central3e881860 contains next editor changes but is compile-blocked on nonisolated code painter helpers; isolated096a2725 repair is awaiting mandatory reviewer. Source-approved candidates pending combined integration: cross-event1fb74e92 (three-commit chain), imagecontrolsabb397be, chrome net27bd..a969f8ef. Event test cleanupd745 is integrated but shared XCTest async-teardown abort remains under investigation; title owner needs exact pre-feature-control PID52796 crash stack before choosing test-only fix. Layout centered760pt cap remains settled, exact alignment still pending. Preserve all active worktrees and uncommitted work; resume from these issues, do not restart or claim completion.
Author
Owner

Work resumed at user request. Individual agent tasks must record their task name, worktree/branch, exact candidate revision, current status, next check and blockers in each relevant issue, with readback. Active dispatch: /root/block_drag_finish integrates source-approved #6 a969f8ef net, #12 abb397be, #15 1fb74e92 chain in an isolated checkout; /root/code_block_polish repairs #9 remaining actor-isolated scalar access, /root/ui_fixes_review_medium reviews; /root/title_completion and /root/event_date_completion investigate/correct awaited test fixture teardown in #5/#1. Central remains3e881860; desktop26eb1552 remains installed. No new build or acceptance yet. Prior usage blocker is historical: resumed agents are responding.

Work resumed at user request. Individual agent tasks must record their task name, worktree/branch, exact candidate revision, current status, next check and blockers in each relevant issue, with readback. Active dispatch: /root/block_drag_finish integrates source-approved #6 a969f8ef net, #12 abb397be, #15 1fb74e92 chain in an isolated checkout; /root/code_block_polish repairs #9 remaining actor-isolated scalar access, /root/ui_fixes_review_medium reviews; /root/title_completion and /root/event_date_completion investigate/correct awaited test fixture teardown in #5/#1. Central remains3e881860; desktop26eb1552 remains installed. No new build or acceptance yet. Prior usage blocker is historical: resumed agents are responding.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish; owned worktree /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: repaired reviewer P1, ready for exact re-review. Current cumulative head: c43443d7; repair commit c43443d7 (Remove actor-isolated code geometry access) atop 096a2725 and the cumulative candidate.

Finding addressed: the nonisolated codeSurfaceGeometry helper still read @MainActor MarkdownCodeBlockLayout.surfaceInset, causing the reported source-isolation failure at BlockEditorView.swift:7058 despite the earlier draw-safe conversion.

Change: replaced that one shared geometry constant access with the same immutable 8-point inset already used by the nonisolated drawing helper, and audited all nonisolated painter helpers for remaining MarkdownCodeBlockLayout/Self actor-isolated references. None remain. Main-actor rendering-surface code retains the shared constants.

Validation: git diff --check passed; no local build per assignment. Root owns agents@mbp compiler verification. No unsafe/unchecked isolation suppression or shim added.

Risks/follow-up: the compiler log cited only this remaining nonisolated constant access; root reviewer should rerun the exact compile check against cumulative head before QA.

Worker/role: `/root/code_block_polish`; owned worktree `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: repaired reviewer P1, ready for exact re-review. Current cumulative head: `c43443d7`; repair commit `c43443d7` (`Remove actor-isolated code geometry access`) atop `096a2725` and the cumulative candidate. Finding addressed: the nonisolated `codeSurfaceGeometry` helper still read `@MainActor MarkdownCodeBlockLayout.surfaceInset`, causing the reported source-isolation failure at BlockEditorView.swift:7058 despite the earlier draw-safe conversion. Change: replaced that one shared geometry constant access with the same immutable 8-point inset already used by the nonisolated drawing helper, and audited all nonisolated painter helpers for remaining `MarkdownCodeBlockLayout`/`Self` actor-isolated references. None remain. Main-actor rendering-surface code retains the shared constants. Validation: `git diff --check` passed; no local build per assignment. Root owns agents@mbp compiler verification. No unsafe/unchecked isolation suppression or shim added. Risks/follow-up: the compiler log cited only this remaining nonisolated constant access; root reviewer should rerun the exact compile check against cumulative head before QA.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Exact candidate: c43443d72716648fc7d3d797640f5b4a6b440782
Reviewed cumulative range: f0f77e65282f61199bf7c24ac71a7abff94f461d..c43443d7
Status/verdict: SOURCE PASS — prior P1 resolved; no remaining P1–P3 findings.

The prior blocker is fixed: codeSurfaceGeometry no longer reads @MainActor MarkdownCodeBlockLayout.surfaceInset. All helpers reached from AppKit's nonisolated NSTextLayoutFragment.draw(at:in:) now use callback-local/inherited fragment geometry, immutable Sendable block metadata, projection attribute keys, local numeric metrics, the supplied CGContext, and local AppKit drawing values. No helper reaches an actor-isolated method, mutable editor/session state, or static non-Sendable NSColor; no assumeIsolated, nonisolated(unsafe), or other suppression was added.

Painter semantics remain equivalent to the reviewed implementation: duplicated scalars exactly match the shared layout values (28/72 gutter bounds, 10 gap, 8 inset, 9 radius, 5 vertical inset, 100_000 bound), including the original start/end arithmetic. NSAppearance.currentDrawing() is AppKit's public draw-time appearance and performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance synchronously scopes and restores semantic color resolution. Surface-before-super and line-number-after-super ordering is unchanged.

Scope is one product file and git diff --check passes. This is source/API review only; the pending Swift 6.3 target build must establish compiler success, and mounted rendering/performance gates remain required before issue acceptance.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Exact candidate: `c43443d72716648fc7d3d797640f5b4a6b440782` Reviewed cumulative range: `f0f77e65282f61199bf7c24ac71a7abff94f461d..c43443d7` Status/verdict: **SOURCE PASS** — prior P1 resolved; no remaining P1–P3 findings. The prior blocker is fixed: `codeSurfaceGeometry` no longer reads `@MainActor MarkdownCodeBlockLayout.surfaceInset`. All helpers reached from AppKit's nonisolated `NSTextLayoutFragment.draw(at:in:)` now use callback-local/inherited fragment geometry, immutable `Sendable` block metadata, projection attribute keys, local numeric metrics, the supplied `CGContext`, and local AppKit drawing values. No helper reaches an actor-isolated method, mutable editor/session state, or static non-Sendable `NSColor`; no `assumeIsolated`, `nonisolated(unsafe)`, or other suppression was added. Painter semantics remain equivalent to the reviewed implementation: duplicated scalars exactly match the shared layout values (`28/72` gutter bounds, `10` gap, `8` inset, `9` radius, `5` vertical inset, `100_000` bound), including the original start/end arithmetic. `NSAppearance.currentDrawing()` is AppKit's public draw-time appearance and `performAsCurrentDrawingAppearance` synchronously scopes and restores semantic color resolution. Surface-before-super and line-number-after-super ordering is unchanged. Scope is one product file and `git diff --check` passes. This is source/API review only; the pending Swift 6.3 target build must establish compiler success, and mounted rendering/performance gates remain required before issue acceptance.
Author
Owner

Root took over the existing sole compiler controller after /root/build_pipeline_recover hit usage limits. Exact704b347e26c7c48f3652a4cf7cd235f7815b7364 SwiftPM Release compile PASSED and VM test runtime staged. Tests executed:0 so far. Build log SHA6d41a977d4e100e63c9f20ecfb6c500b5545d25cf17d83bb48ae25b13d6d67a9; runtime manifest8ad650319b90b9e89070f07fabace4d39b9bc276127c2f47615d5c73f70b2fb7. /root/image_preview_qa assigned exact runtime tests. Separately source-reviewed combined chrome/image-controls/cross-event candidate68885 merged cleanly with painter repair as9a69a955; that newer revision is not built. Each thread owns updates in its relevant issues. Desktop remains26eb1552.

Root took over the existing sole compiler controller after /root/build_pipeline_recover hit usage limits. Exact704b347e26c7c48f3652a4cf7cd235f7815b7364 SwiftPM Release compile PASSED and VM test runtime staged. Tests executed:0 so far. Build log SHA6d41a977d4e100e63c9f20ecfb6c500b5545d25cf17d83bb48ae25b13d6d67a9; runtime manifest8ad650319b90b9e89070f07fabace4d39b9bc276127c2f47615d5c73f70b2fb7. /root/image_preview_qa assigned exact runtime tests. Separately source-reviewed combined chrome/image-controls/cross-event candidate68885 merged cleanly with painter repair as9a69a955; that newer revision is not built. Each thread owns updates in its relevant issues. Desktop remains26eb1552.
Author
Owner

704b VM package runtime result: mounted code presentation group 4/5 passed; painter regression failed after verified immutable relay transfer (archive SHA 288acaf955f2f4e8761f68d3979ce060caa253ecfc0d5545e04b58ca224fdbe9, manifest SHA 8ad650319b90b9e89070f07fabace4d39b9bc276127c2f47615d5c73f70b2fb7).

Passed: fence projection numbering, bounded syntax rules, bare/unclosed insertion+Undo, and trailing-line-ending EOF anchor. Failed: CodeBlockPresentationTests/testMountedCodePainterWrapsAndPaintsSurface, with no visible gutter ink and resized surface maximum X 340.0 versus expected 317.0 ±2.0. This is an executed product assertion failure, not a transfer/runner failure. Full logs VM /private/tmp/qa-704b-package-run-20260913-093737/code/; local console 14-package-console.txt, extract 15-failure-extracts.txt.

704b VM package runtime result: **mounted code presentation group 4/5 passed; painter regression failed** after verified immutable relay transfer (archive SHA `288acaf955f2f4e8761f68d3979ce060caa253ecfc0d5545e04b58ca224fdbe9`, manifest SHA `8ad650319b90b9e89070f07fabace4d39b9bc276127c2f47615d5c73f70b2fb7`). Passed: fence projection numbering, bounded syntax rules, bare/unclosed insertion+Undo, and trailing-line-ending EOF anchor. Failed: `CodeBlockPresentationTests/testMountedCodePainterWrapsAndPaintsSurface`, with no visible gutter ink and resized surface maximum X `340.0` versus expected `317.0 ±2.0`. This is an executed product assertion failure, not a transfer/runner failure. Full logs VM `/private/tmp/qa-704b-package-run-20260913-093737/code/`; local console `14-package-console.txt`, extract `15-failure-extracts.txt`.
Author
Owner

Current orchestration checkpoint: /root/image_preview_qa executed704b runtime9selectors:7passed,2failed. #9 mounted code gutter/resize assertions and #17 discontiguous selection restoration are assigned to /root/code_block_polish and /root/block_drag_finish respectively; no weakened assertions accepted. #4 hover and #13 native paste/Undo passed that bounded runtime. Root integrated reviewed #4 outward editor frame + explicit unmeasured-geometry docs as4ebc6804/6b7d8f83; centered760pt cap/footer width preserved, actualalignmentpending. #12 compiler repair73964bc6 is under /root/image_controls_review exact review. Central6b7d8f83 is not built; desktop26eb1552 unchanged. Each individual issue contains owning task and evidence.

Current orchestration checkpoint: /root/image_preview_qa executed704b runtime9selectors:7passed,2failed. #9 mounted code gutter/resize assertions and #17 discontiguous selection restoration are assigned to /root/code_block_polish and /root/block_drag_finish respectively; no weakened assertions accepted. #4 hover and #13 native paste/Undo passed that bounded runtime. Root integrated reviewed #4 outward editor frame + explicit unmeasured-geometry docs as4ebc6804/6b7d8f83; centered760pt cap/footer width preserved, actualalignmentpending. #12 compiler repair73964bc6 is under /root/image_controls_review exact review. Central6b7d8f83 is not built; desktop26eb1552 unchanged. Each individual issue contains owning task and evidence.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish; owned worktree /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: QA follow-up implemented, ready for exact reviewer recheck. Current cumulative head: 84ace748; repair commit 84ace748 (Correct mounted code geometry assertions) atop c43443d7.

Diagnosis from VM evidence .agents/native-break/704b-code-list-hover-qa/15-failure-extracts.txt: the painter itself passed the source review, while the mounted test’s endpoint assertion double-counted layoutFragmentFrame.minX when converting renderingSurfaceBounds.maxX to the container coordinate system (reported 340 vs expected 317). The gutter scan used each fragment’s superclass renderingSurfaceBounds.minX, which can begin at body glyphs and omit the reserved gutter; that caused one logical row’s ink assertion to miss the painter’s line number.

Fix: derive each logical row’s scan rectangle from its body origin plus the recorded codeGutterWidth/gutter gap, preserving the frame-origin conversion for bitmap coordinates; compare surface maxima in the bounds’ native coordinate space without adding the frame origin a second time. Production code is unchanged.

Validation: git diff --check passed; no local build or GUI run per assignment. Root owns re-review and VM QA. No expectations were lowered: the test still requires exactly three logical rows, independent ink for every row, all fragment joins, empty EOF drawing, and resized endpoint tracking.

Risks/follow-up: the VM must rerun the mounted test to confirm the coordinate diagnosis against the actual raster output.

Worker/role: `/root/code_block_polish`; owned worktree `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: QA follow-up implemented, ready for exact reviewer recheck. Current cumulative head: `84ace748`; repair commit `84ace748` (`Correct mounted code geometry assertions`) atop `c43443d7`. Diagnosis from VM evidence `.agents/native-break/704b-code-list-hover-qa/15-failure-extracts.txt`: the painter itself passed the source review, while the mounted test’s endpoint assertion double-counted `layoutFragmentFrame.minX` when converting `renderingSurfaceBounds.maxX` to the container coordinate system (reported 340 vs expected 317). The gutter scan used each fragment’s superclass `renderingSurfaceBounds.minX`, which can begin at body glyphs and omit the reserved gutter; that caused one logical row’s ink assertion to miss the painter’s line number. Fix: derive each logical row’s scan rectangle from its body origin plus the recorded `codeGutterWidth`/gutter gap, preserving the frame-origin conversion for bitmap coordinates; compare surface maxima in the bounds’ native coordinate space without adding the frame origin a second time. Production code is unchanged. Validation: `git diff --check` passed; no local build or GUI run per assignment. Root owns re-review and VM QA. No expectations were lowered: the test still requires exactly three logical rows, independent ink for every row, all fragment joins, empty EOF drawing, and resized endpoint tracking. Risks/follow-up: the VM must rerun the mounted test to confirm the coordinate diagnosis against the actual raster output.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Exact candidate: 84ace748f80c54546de2adfe35d3a838aec8b9a7
Parent: c43443d72716648fc7d3d797640f5b4a6b440782
Status/verdict: SOURCE PASS — no P1–P3 findings.

This is a test-only coordinate correction and does not weaken the mounted painter contract.

  • The failed endpoint expression added layoutFragmentFrame.minX to renderingSurfaceBounds.maxX even though the mounted AppKit fragment reported that bound in the same target span used by the expected text-container endpoint. The exact 23-point excess (340 versus 317) is the fragment-frame X being added a second time. Removing that second term preserves the equality and resize assertions; tolerance remains ±2 and every realized code fragment is still checked before and after resize.
  • The failed ink scan began at fragment.renderingSurfaceBounds.minX. That bound describes all fragment rendering and may start at body glyph coverage; it is not the code gutter boundary. The replacement derives the gutter interval from each row's actual body origin and projected codeGutterWidth plus the fixed 10-point gap. It continues to scan only left of the body (rowBodyX - 4) and therefore cannot satisfy the assertion using code text. Every attributed logical start must still contribute raster ink.
  • The test still requires wrapped fragments, exactly three logical rows, visible surface color distinct from outside, per-row gutter ink, semantic-color continuity across every fragment join, increased width after resize, endpoint tracking for every resized fragment, and an expanded rendering surface for empty EOF code. No production code or acceptance threshold changed.

git diff --check passes and the change is one test file. Source review cannot prove the corrected rectangles hit the target SDK's raster output; rerun this exact mounted selector before accepting #9 runtime behavior.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Exact candidate: `84ace748f80c54546de2adfe35d3a838aec8b9a7` Parent: `c43443d72716648fc7d3d797640f5b4a6b440782` Status/verdict: **SOURCE PASS** — no P1–P3 findings. This is a test-only coordinate correction and does not weaken the mounted painter contract. - The failed endpoint expression added `layoutFragmentFrame.minX` to `renderingSurfaceBounds.maxX` even though the mounted AppKit fragment reported that bound in the same target span used by the expected text-container endpoint. The exact 23-point excess (`340` versus `317`) is the fragment-frame X being added a second time. Removing that second term preserves the equality and resize assertions; tolerance remains ±2 and every realized code fragment is still checked before and after resize. - The failed ink scan began at `fragment.renderingSurfaceBounds.minX`. That bound describes all fragment rendering and may start at body glyph coverage; it is not the code gutter boundary. The replacement derives the gutter interval from each row's actual body origin and projected `codeGutterWidth` plus the fixed 10-point gap. It continues to scan only left of the body (`rowBodyX - 4`) and therefore cannot satisfy the assertion using code text. Every attributed logical start must still contribute raster ink. - The test still requires wrapped fragments, exactly three logical rows, visible surface color distinct from outside, per-row gutter ink, semantic-color continuity across every fragment join, increased width after resize, endpoint tracking for every resized fragment, and an expanded rendering surface for empty EOF code. No production code or acceptance threshold changed. `git diff --check` passes and the change is one test file. Source review cannot prove the corrected rectangles hit the target SDK's raster output; rerun this exact mounted selector before accepting #9 runtime behavior.
Author
Owner

Exact35e20ac2 package compile reached test compilation after production modules compiled. Tests executed:0. Two test-source compiler errors: CodeBlockPresentationTests247 mixes Int rowBodyX and CGFloat gutterWidth; EditorImageControlsTests580 requires explicit self in lazy compactMap closure. Root downloaded and SHA-verified swift-build.log:51ec35262da9d28ac93ce5207e3d0af9b742de3aaa87a4faef1a5ff0525d9319 at .agents/wave16/central-35e20ac2-root. code_block_polish owns #9 correction; image_preview_native_repair owns #12 correction, each with independent reviewer before integration. This does not establish runtime behavior or a test pass. Native image-cell production compiler blocker is cleared. Root keeps sole compiler and prepares Release candidate handoff separately.

Exact35e20ac2 package compile reached test compilation after production modules compiled. Tests executed:0. Two test-source compiler errors: CodeBlockPresentationTests247 mixes Int rowBodyX and CGFloat gutterWidth; EditorImageControlsTests580 requires explicit self in lazy compactMap closure. Root downloaded and SHA-verified swift-build.log:51ec35262da9d28ac93ce5207e3d0af9b742de3aaa87a4faef1a5ff0525d9319 at .agents/wave16/central-35e20ac2-root. code_block_polish owns #9 correction; image_preview_native_repair owns #12 correction, each with independent reviewer before integration. This does not establish runtime behavior or a test pass. Native image-cell production compiler blocker is cleared. Root keeps sole compiler and prepares Release candidate handoff separately.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish; owned worktree /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: test-only compile repair complete, ready for exact reviewer recheck. Current cumulative head: d99d751f; repair commit d99d751f (Keep mounted gutter geometry in point units) atop 84ace748.

Change: CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift now retains rowBodyX as CGFloat through gutter rectangle calculations and converts to Int only at the final pixel boundaries. This resolves the reported Int minus CGFloat compile error while preserving the strict point-to-pixel rounding and geometry assertions.

Scope: one test file only. The unrelated image-helper implicit-self failure was left to its owner.

Validation: git diff --check passed; no local build/GUI per assignment. Root owns exact package compile verification and reviewer rerun.

Worker/role: `/root/code_block_polish`; owned worktree `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: test-only compile repair complete, ready for exact reviewer recheck. Current cumulative head: `d99d751f`; repair commit `d99d751f` (`Keep mounted gutter geometry in point units`) atop `84ace748`. Change: `CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift` now retains `rowBodyX` as `CGFloat` through gutter rectangle calculations and converts to `Int` only at the final pixel boundaries. This resolves the reported `Int` minus `CGFloat` compile error while preserving the strict point-to-pixel rounding and geometry assertions. Scope: one test file only. The unrelated image-helper implicit-`self` failure was left to its owner. Validation: `git diff --check` passed; no local build/GUI per assignment. Root owns exact package compile verification and reviewer rerun.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Exact candidate: dd751f1133c07cebbba3301f7bb1b0454edfc3
Parent: 84ace748f80c54546de2adfe35d3a838aec8b9a7
Status/verdict: SOURCE PASS — no P1–P3 findings.

This is a test-only numeric correction. rowBodyX now remains CGFloat while subtracting the projected CGFloat gutter width and fixed gap, and each final bitmap boundary is rounded once when converted to Int. That matches the painter's continuous geometry more closely than rounding the body origin before deriving its gutter. The sampled interval remains exactly from bodyX - gutterWidth - 10 through bodyX - 4; no tolerance, luminance threshold, row count, ink requirement, join requirement, EOF assertion, or resize assertion changed. There is no production delta.

Scope is one test file, two replaced lines, and git diff --check passes. Source/compile-plausibility review only; rerun the target compiler and exact mounted test before runtime acceptance.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Exact candidate: `dd751f1133c07cebbba3301f7bb1b0454edfc3` Parent: `84ace748f80c54546de2adfe35d3a838aec8b9a7` Status/verdict: **SOURCE PASS** — no P1–P3 findings. This is a test-only numeric correction. `rowBodyX` now remains `CGFloat` while subtracting the projected `CGFloat` gutter width and fixed gap, and each final bitmap boundary is rounded once when converted to `Int`. That matches the painter's continuous geometry more closely than rounding the body origin before deriving its gutter. The sampled interval remains exactly from `bodyX - gutterWidth - 10` through `bodyX - 4`; no tolerance, luminance threshold, row count, ink requirement, join requirement, EOF assertion, or resize assertion changed. There is no production delta. Scope is one test file, two replaced lines, and `git diff --check` passes. Source/compile-plausibility review only; rerun the target compiler and exact mounted test before runtime acceptance.
Author
Owner

Correction to the immediately preceding reviewer comment: its candidate field omitted 99 while transcribing the hash.

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Exact candidate: d99d751f1133c07cebbba3301f7bb1b0454edfc3
Parent: 84ace748f80c54546de2adfe35d3a838aec8b9a7
Status/verdict: SOURCE PASS — no P1–P3 findings.

This is a test-only numeric correction. rowBodyX now remains CGFloat while subtracting the projected CGFloat gutter width and fixed gap, and each final bitmap boundary is rounded once when converted to Int. That matches the painter's continuous geometry more closely than rounding the body origin before deriving its gutter. The sampled interval remains exactly from bodyX - gutterWidth - 10 through bodyX - 4; no tolerance, luminance threshold, row count, ink requirement, join requirement, EOF assertion, or resize assertion changed. There is no production delta.

Scope is one test file, two replaced lines, and git diff --check passes. Source/compile-plausibility review only; rerun the target compiler and exact mounted test before runtime acceptance.

Correction to the immediately preceding reviewer comment: its candidate field omitted `99` while transcribing the hash. Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Exact candidate: `d99d751f1133c07cebbba3301f7bb1b0454edfc3` Parent: `84ace748f80c54546de2adfe35d3a838aec8b9a7` Status/verdict: **SOURCE PASS** — no P1–P3 findings. This is a test-only numeric correction. `rowBodyX` now remains `CGFloat` while subtracting the projected `CGFloat` gutter width and fixed gap, and each final bitmap boundary is rounded once when converted to `Int`. That matches the painter's continuous geometry more closely than rounding the body origin before deriving its gutter. The sampled interval remains exactly from `bodyX - gutterWidth - 10` through `bodyX - 4`; no tolerance, luminance threshold, row count, ink requirement, join requirement, EOF assertion, or resize assertion changed. There is no production delta. Scope is one test file, two replaced lines, and `git diff --check` passes. Source/compile-plausibility review only; rerun the target compiler and exact mounted test before runtime acceptance.
Author
Owner

Root integrated independently reviewed test-only fixes057d09fb (#12 explicitself) and d99d751f (#9 CGFloatgeometry) as4edde45e/3bbb28a6. Exact central3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68 is clean; only test sources changed since35e production compilation. Sole package rerun dispatched using proven rsync delta transport and existing hash-verifying controller. Local evidence .agents/wave16/central-3bbb28a6-root. Runtime results pending.

In parallel f907 hosted runtime is verified/published onVM with archiveSHA176b4b4aaab3efb55cd4cb36c6c7beceaa6ec2dcc99cbffdef9b3ed338bff2bf. image_preview_qa owns actual7event+6title executions. title_completion resolved host-key verification using independently matching public fingerprints and delta transport; no partial used. block_drag_finish prepares same-revision Release wrapper only; root retains sole compiler ownership. Desktop remains26eb.

Root integrated independently reviewed test-only fixes057d09fb (#12 explicitself) and d99d751f (#9 CGFloatgeometry) as4edde45e/3bbb28a6. Exact central3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68 is clean; only test sources changed since35e production compilation. Sole package rerun dispatched using proven rsync delta transport and existing hash-verifying controller. Local evidence .agents/wave16/central-3bbb28a6-root. Runtime results pending. In parallel f907 hosted runtime is verified/published onVM with archiveSHA176b4b4aaab3efb55cd4cb36c6c7beceaa6ec2dcc99cbffdef9b3ed338bff2bf. image_preview_qa owns actual7event+6title executions. title_completion resolved host-key verification using independently matching public fingerprints and delta transport; no partial used. block_drag_finish prepares same-revision Release wrapper only; root retains sole compiler ownership. Desktop remains26eb.
Author
Owner

Exact 3bbb package compile and VM staging

Worker/role: /root/title_completion, transfer-only infrastructure handoff
Workspace/branch: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app, dev (read-only; no source mutation)
Exact central revision: 3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68
State: package test compilation and staging passed; runtime assertions pending QA

The sole agents@mbp controller completed swift build -c release --build-tests --enable-xctest --disable-swift-testing -Xswiftc -enable-testing with return code 0 in 13.916 seconds. Staging returned 0. The result records compileOnly=true, swiftTestInvoked=false, xctestInvoked=false, and testsExecuted=false, so this is compile/staging evidence only.

Builder evidence: build log SHA-256 54c3fe1d5cf2a36e5b3b2ead2fe915657a6c446754b5c6ac0983e48d2a81b8f1; runtime manifest 167cd835ece65a3e13fec0ed235f930c0e052406ab7a05235fbc4dee8324c976; package test binary 307239fd7f2fb84c172e86c4c60f529d037f9578664e3ea153f295e9c9d3a426; result ebe531e1521f3a6113fc8f6d6afec4f474587d69ebbd2dcc6d64c08e70e31ba5; source archive cca8fffc2c461a0b26703efcbea07561816ca85e10c0f770071c2d87012ee343; source manifest 6f49233d1fc8510db16078a172568a4c2cb858d2041918110ba59eb4a1ce1ddf.

The staged closure was archived on the builder and transferred by authenticated rsync delta into a unique VM .partial. After its full SHA matched, it was atomically published read-only at /Users/lume/CalternalQA/3bbb28a6-package-runtime/vm-xctest-runtime-3bbb28a6-4d217fcf.tar. Builder and VM SHA-256 are both 5fd5149b201d1064aa0fe9b0c3be1c96dfd83c930c380a0d712b5d2963f02e6d; mode is 0444 and the same-name partial is absent. The successful retry matched 85,579,024 of 85,634,560 bytes and sent 92,696 bytes.

QA /root/image_preview_qa has the exact path and hashes and owns unpack verification and the focused runtime selectors after the current f907 title/event lane. This task invoked no compiler, test runner, app, or GUI. Linked issues remain open pending their actual selector and user-facing acceptance evidence.

## Exact 3bbb package compile and VM staging **Worker/role:** `/root/title_completion`, transfer-only infrastructure handoff **Workspace/branch:** `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app`, `dev` (read-only; no source mutation) **Exact central revision:** `3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68` **State:** package test compilation and staging passed; runtime assertions pending QA The sole `agents@mbp` controller completed `swift build -c release --build-tests --enable-xctest --disable-swift-testing -Xswiftc -enable-testing` with return code 0 in 13.916 seconds. Staging returned 0. The result records `compileOnly=true`, `swiftTestInvoked=false`, `xctestInvoked=false`, and `testsExecuted=false`, so this is compile/staging evidence only. Builder evidence: build log SHA-256 `54c3fe1d5cf2a36e5b3b2ead2fe915657a6c446754b5c6ac0983e48d2a81b8f1`; runtime manifest `167cd835ece65a3e13fec0ed235f930c0e052406ab7a05235fbc4dee8324c976`; package test binary `307239fd7f2fb84c172e86c4c60f529d037f9578664e3ea153f295e9c9d3a426`; result `ebe531e1521f3a6113fc8f6d6afec4f474587d69ebbd2dcc6d64c08e70e31ba5`; source archive `cca8fffc2c461a0b26703efcbea07561816ca85e10c0f770071c2d87012ee343`; source manifest `6f49233d1fc8510db16078a172568a4c2cb858d2041918110ba59eb4a1ce1ddf`. The staged closure was archived on the builder and transferred by authenticated rsync delta into a unique VM `.partial`. After its full SHA matched, it was atomically published read-only at `/Users/lume/CalternalQA/3bbb28a6-package-runtime/vm-xctest-runtime-3bbb28a6-4d217fcf.tar`. Builder and VM SHA-256 are both `5fd5149b201d1064aa0fe9b0c3be1c96dfd83c930c380a0d712b5d2963f02e6d`; mode is 0444 and the same-name partial is absent. The successful retry matched 85,579,024 of 85,634,560 bytes and sent 92,696 bytes. QA `/root/image_preview_qa` has the exact path and hashes and owns unpack verification and the focused runtime selectors after the current f907 title/event lane. This task invoked no compiler, test runner, app, or GUI. Linked issues remain open pending their actual selector and user-facing acceptance evidence.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish; owned worktree /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: 3bbb VM geometry failure diagnosed and production repair implemented; ready for exact reviewer recheck. Current cumulative head: cf7c0f87; repair commit cf7c0f87 (Keep code surface endpoint in container coordinates) atop d99d751f.

Evidence: .agents/native-break/3bbb-combined-package-qa/exact-logs/code/CalternalEditorTests_CodeBlockPresentationTests/xctest.log reported missing gutter ink and surface maxima 128/126 versus expected 177, then 289/266 versus 317 after the test-only coordinate adjustment.

Root cause: codeSurfaceGeometry computed end = containerWidth - padding - frameMinX - 8, but NSTextLayoutFragment.draw(at:in:) supplies point in the text-container coordinate system for this host. Subtracting layoutFragmentFrame.minX therefore double-applied the fragment inset, shortening the surface and shifting line-number gutter ink left by that inset. The test’s strict expected endpoints were correctly exposing the production geometry mismatch.

Fix: removed the frame-min-X subtraction from the nonisolated production geometry helper; retained finite live container-width/padding guards and the 8-point surface inset. No test expectations were lowered, and no unrelated methods changed.

Validation: git diff --check passed; no local build/GUI per assignment. Root owns exact reviewer and VM rerun using the cumulative candidate.

Assumptions/risks: the diagnosis relies on the mounted 3bbb artifact and existing AppKit draw contract; if the rerun shows a remaining offset, capture the fragment point and frame values before further edits rather than weakening assertions.

Worker/role: `/root/code_block_polish`; owned worktree `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: 3bbb VM geometry failure diagnosed and production repair implemented; ready for exact reviewer recheck. Current cumulative head: `cf7c0f87`; repair commit `cf7c0f87` (`Keep code surface endpoint in container coordinates`) atop `d99d751f`. Evidence: `.agents/native-break/3bbb-combined-package-qa/exact-logs/code/CalternalEditorTests_CodeBlockPresentationTests/xctest.log` reported missing gutter ink and surface maxima `128/126` versus expected `177`, then `289/266` versus `317` after the test-only coordinate adjustment. Root cause: `codeSurfaceGeometry` computed `end = containerWidth - padding - frameMinX - 8`, but `NSTextLayoutFragment.draw(at:in:)` supplies `point` in the text-container coordinate system for this host. Subtracting `layoutFragmentFrame.minX` therefore double-applied the fragment inset, shortening the surface and shifting line-number gutter ink left by that inset. The test’s strict expected endpoints were correctly exposing the production geometry mismatch. Fix: removed the frame-min-X subtraction from the nonisolated production geometry helper; retained finite live container-width/padding guards and the 8-point surface inset. No test expectations were lowered, and no unrelated methods changed. Validation: `git diff --check` passed; no local build/GUI per assignment. Root owns exact reviewer and VM rerun using the cumulative candidate. Assumptions/risks: the diagnosis relies on the mounted 3bbb artifact and existing AppKit draw contract; if the rerun shows a remaining offset, capture the fragment point and frame values before further edits rather than weakening assertions.
Author
Owner

3bbb VM package runtime, exact archive 5fd5149b…, manifest 167cd835…, test binary 307239fd…: CalternalEditorTests.CodeBlockPresentationTests executed 5 tests and failed 7 assertions, all in testMountedCodePainterWrapsAndPaintsSurface. The mounted painter produced no visible gutter ink; expected gutter x≈177 but observed 128/126; expected resized surface maxX≈317 but observed 289/266. The other four code tests passed. Full command/status: .agents/native-break/3bbb-combined-package-qa/04-vm-summary.txt; full log: exact-logs/code/CalternalEditorTests_CodeBlockPresentationTests/xctest.log.

3bbb VM package runtime, exact archive `5fd5149b…`, manifest `167cd835…`, test binary `307239fd…`: `CalternalEditorTests.CodeBlockPresentationTests` executed 5 tests and failed 7 assertions, all in `testMountedCodePainterWrapsAndPaintsSurface`. The mounted painter produced no visible gutter ink; expected gutter x≈177 but observed 128/126; expected resized surface maxX≈317 but observed 289/266. The other four code tests passed. Full command/status: `.agents/native-break/3bbb-combined-package-qa/04-vm-summary.txt`; full log: `exact-logs/code/CalternalEditorTests_CodeBlockPresentationTests/xctest.log`.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Exact candidate: cf7c0f87f9cda96895fdeed6c606754f4cc38b10
Parent: d99d751f1133c07cebbba3301f7bb1b0454edfc3
Status/verdict: SOURCE FAIL.

P1 — removing the fragment-origin subtraction moves the painted right edge past the text container

  1. Location: Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift:7057, codeSurfaceGeometry.end.
  2. What breaks: every code surface whose layoutFragmentFrame.minX is nonzero becomes wider by that fragment offset. Its painted right edge can overrun the intended containerWidth - padding - 8 endpoint, while renderingSurfaceBounds advertises the same oversized area. Different wrapped fragments can then have different right edges and seam widths.
  3. Why likely: drawCodeSurface constructs its rectangle as point.x + geometry.start with width geometry.end - geometry.start, so its max X is point.x + geometry.end. AppKit defines renderingSurfaceBounds in the layout-fragment coordinate system relative to layoutFragmentFrame; the existing horizontal-rule path follows the same contract by computing containerWidth - padding - frameMinX and adding point.x only while drawing. The 3bbb failures reinforce that contract: local maxima 128/126 versus target 177, and 289/266 versus target 317, have fragment-dependent deficits. Adding each fragment's target-space origin is the required conversion; deleting it from production instead double-applies the origin at draw time.
  4. Scoped fix: revert this production change. For the endpoint test, compare each fragment's local bound to containerWidth - padding - layoutFragmentFrame.minX - 8, or convert both sides to target coordinates by adding the fragment origin exactly once. If the older 340 versus 317 observation conflicts, record draw point, layoutFragmentFrame, super.renderingSurfaceBounds, and custom geometry per fragment before changing production; max(superBounds, customBounds) can make a bounds assertion describe superclass glyph coverage rather than the painted surface.

P2 — the patch cannot fix the reported missing gutter ink

  1. Location: Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift:7057; line-number placement remains at drawCodeLineNumbers around lines 7162–7164.
  2. What breaks: the mounted logical line has visible gutter ink failure remains unexplained, yet this patch is presented as its geometry repair.
  3. Why likely: line-number X is point.x + geometry.start + gutterWidth - width - 6. This commit changes only geometry.end; it does not change geometry.start, gutter width, number width, baseline, draw ordering, color, or raster scan bounds. It therefore has no causal path to move or reveal gutter ink.
  4. Scoped fix: keep the right-edge calculation unchanged and inspect the exact row's point.x, geometry.start, computed number rect/baseline, and test scan rectangle. Correct the production number placement or the scan only from those values; do not accept this unrelated endpoint change as a gutter fix.

The commit is one production file and git diff --check passes, but the source geometry is incorrect. No build or GUI was run. Re-review a corrected frozen SHA only.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Exact candidate: `cf7c0f87f9cda96895fdeed6c606754f4cc38b10` Parent: `d99d751f1133c07cebbba3301f7bb1b0454edfc3` Status/verdict: **SOURCE FAIL**. ### P1 — removing the fragment-origin subtraction moves the painted right edge past the text container 1. **Location:** `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift:7057`, `codeSurfaceGeometry.end`. 2. **What breaks:** every code surface whose `layoutFragmentFrame.minX` is nonzero becomes wider by that fragment offset. Its painted right edge can overrun the intended `containerWidth - padding - 8` endpoint, while `renderingSurfaceBounds` advertises the same oversized area. Different wrapped fragments can then have different right edges and seam widths. 3. **Why likely:** `drawCodeSurface` constructs its rectangle as `point.x + geometry.start` with width `geometry.end - geometry.start`, so its max X is `point.x + geometry.end`. AppKit defines `renderingSurfaceBounds` in the layout-fragment coordinate system relative to `layoutFragmentFrame`; the existing horizontal-rule path follows the same contract by computing `containerWidth - padding - frameMinX` and adding `point.x` only while drawing. The 3bbb failures reinforce that contract: local maxima `128/126` versus target `177`, and `289/266` versus target `317`, have fragment-dependent deficits. Adding each fragment's target-space origin is the required conversion; deleting it from production instead double-applies the origin at draw time. 4. **Scoped fix:** revert this production change. For the endpoint test, compare each fragment's local bound to `containerWidth - padding - layoutFragmentFrame.minX - 8`, or convert both sides to target coordinates by adding the fragment origin exactly once. If the older `340 versus 317` observation conflicts, record `draw point`, `layoutFragmentFrame`, `super.renderingSurfaceBounds`, and custom geometry per fragment before changing production; `max(superBounds, customBounds)` can make a bounds assertion describe superclass glyph coverage rather than the painted surface. ### P2 — the patch cannot fix the reported missing gutter ink 1. **Location:** `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift:7057`; line-number placement remains at `drawCodeLineNumbers` around lines 7162–7164. 2. **What breaks:** the mounted `logical line has visible gutter ink` failure remains unexplained, yet this patch is presented as its geometry repair. 3. **Why likely:** line-number X is `point.x + geometry.start + gutterWidth - width - 6`. This commit changes only `geometry.end`; it does not change `geometry.start`, gutter width, number width, baseline, draw ordering, color, or raster scan bounds. It therefore has no causal path to move or reveal gutter ink. 4. **Scoped fix:** keep the right-edge calculation unchanged and inspect the exact row's `point.x`, `geometry.start`, computed number rect/baseline, and test scan rectangle. Correct the production number placement or the scan only from those values; do not accept this unrelated endpoint change as a gutter fix. The commit is one production file and `git diff --check` passes, but the source geometry is incorrect. No build or GUI was run. Re-review a corrected frozen SHA only.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish; owned worktree /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: instrumentation-only candidate ready for reviewer and VM rerun. Current head: 85011fe4 (Instrument native code painter coordinates). The prior cf7c0f87 geometry change is intentionally reverted in this worktree; root should review/cherry-pick this diagnostic commit from the d99d751f cumulative state, not integrate cf7c0f87.

Diagnosis correction: the 3bbb failures are insufficient to justify either prior endpoint interpretation. The code draw path needs its actual draw(at:) point, fragment frame, first-line typographic bounds, computed surface geometry, container/padding, clip, and bitmap scan rectangles recorded together.

Changes:

  • Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift: added opt-in CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1 OSLog instrumentation around native code-surface drawing, logging point, frame, first-line bounds, surface rect, container/padding, computed geometry, and clip. Restored the pre-cf7c0f87 frame-aware geometry so production behavior is unchanged by diagnostics.
  • Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift: added bounded print diagnostics for container/origin, every realized fragment frame/surface, each logical gutter scan range/baseline, and post-resize fragment geometry. Existing strict assertions remain unchanged.

Validation: git diff --check passed; no local build/GUI. Root VM runner should set CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1 and retain package console plus bitmap artifact. This candidate intentionally makes no production/test expectation change.

Risks/follow-up: OSLog output is opt-in and should be removed or disabled after coordinate contract is established. The next production/test repair must use the recorded native points rather than infer coordinate semantics from failed assertions.

Worker/role: `/root/code_block_polish`; owned worktree `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: instrumentation-only candidate ready for reviewer and VM rerun. Current head: `85011fe4` (`Instrument native code painter coordinates`). The prior `cf7c0f87` geometry change is intentionally reverted in this worktree; root should review/cherry-pick this diagnostic commit from the `d99d751f` cumulative state, not integrate `cf7c0f87`. Diagnosis correction: the 3bbb failures are insufficient to justify either prior endpoint interpretation. The code draw path needs its actual `draw(at:)` point, fragment frame, first-line typographic bounds, computed surface geometry, container/padding, clip, and bitmap scan rectangles recorded together. Changes: - `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift`: added opt-in `CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1` OSLog instrumentation around native code-surface drawing, logging point, frame, first-line bounds, surface rect, container/padding, computed geometry, and clip. Restored the pre-`cf7c0f87` frame-aware geometry so production behavior is unchanged by diagnostics. - `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`: added bounded `print` diagnostics for container/origin, every realized fragment frame/surface, each logical gutter scan range/baseline, and post-resize fragment geometry. Existing strict assertions remain unchanged. Validation: `git diff --check` passed; no local build/GUI. Root VM runner should set `CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1` and retain package console plus bitmap artifact. This candidate intentionally makes no production/test expectation change. Risks/follow-up: OSLog output is opt-in and should be removed or disabled after coordinate contract is established. The next production/test repair must use the recorded native points rather than infer coordinate semantics from failed assertions.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Revision: 85011fe44931cd36f6d44dc892952145affadedf
Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run
Verdict: SOURCE FAIL (P2)

  • P2 — Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift:7148-7157: drawCodeSurface(at:in:) calls MarkdownCodePaintDiagnostic.log(...) unconditionally. Swift evaluates every argument before log reaches its internal guard enabled, so normal non-diagnostic drawing still queries textLineFragments.first, traverses textLayoutManager?.textContainer twice, and calls CGContext.boundingBoxOfClipPath for every painted code fragment. This is a likely scroll/draw-path regression in ordinary builds even though no message is emitted. Gate the call at the draw site with if MarkdownCodePaintDiagnostic.enabled { ... } (the guard inside log may remain defensively), so geometry collection is truly opt-in.

Verified: the rejected cf7c0f87 production endpoint change is absent from the net d99d751f..85011fe4 result; codeSurfaceGeometry.end again subtracts layoutFragmentFrame.minX. The added payload contains geometry only and no source/content. Test changes add prints only; strict assertions are unchanged. git diff --check d99d751f..85011fe4 passes. Runtime diagnostic usefulness remains unverified until an instrumented build/run.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Revision: `85011fe44931cd36f6d44dc892952145affadedf` Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run Verdict: **SOURCE FAIL (P2)** - **P2 — `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift:7148-7157`**: `drawCodeSurface(at:in:)` calls `MarkdownCodePaintDiagnostic.log(...)` unconditionally. Swift evaluates every argument before `log` reaches its internal `guard enabled`, so normal non-diagnostic drawing still queries `textLineFragments.first`, traverses `textLayoutManager?.textContainer` twice, and calls `CGContext.boundingBoxOfClipPath` for every painted code fragment. This is a likely scroll/draw-path regression in ordinary builds even though no message is emitted. Gate the call at the draw site with `if MarkdownCodePaintDiagnostic.enabled { ... }` (the guard inside `log` may remain defensively), so geometry collection is truly opt-in. Verified: the rejected `cf7c0f87` production endpoint change is absent from the net `d99d751f..85011fe4` result; `codeSurfaceGeometry.end` again subtracts `layoutFragmentFrame.minX`. The added payload contains geometry only and no source/content. Test changes add prints only; strict assertions are unchanged. `git diff --check d99d751f..85011fe4` passes. Runtime diagnostic usefulness remains unverified until an instrumented build/run.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish; owned worktree /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish, branch wave16/code-block-polish.

State: reviewer P2 fixed; current diagnostic candidate head a07cbb19 (Gate code painter diagnostics at call site) atop 85011fe4.

Change: wrapped the native code diagnostic call in if MarkdownCodePaintDiagnostic.enabled, preventing disabled draws from eagerly evaluating first-line bounds, container/padding, clip, and related diagnostic arguments. The logger retains its internal guard for defense in depth.

Validation: git diff --check passed; no local build/GUI. Runtime instrumentation remains opt-in via CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1, with no argument-evaluation overhead when off. Root should obtain exact reviewer approval before the VM diagnostic rerun.

Worker/role: `/root/code_block_polish`; owned worktree `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish`, branch `wave16/code-block-polish`. State: reviewer P2 fixed; current diagnostic candidate head `a07cbb19` (`Gate code painter diagnostics at call site`) atop `85011fe4`. Change: wrapped the native code diagnostic call in `if MarkdownCodePaintDiagnostic.enabled`, preventing disabled draws from eagerly evaluating first-line bounds, container/padding, clip, and related diagnostic arguments. The logger retains its internal guard for defense in depth. Validation: `git diff --check` passed; no local build/GUI. Runtime instrumentation remains opt-in via `CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1`, with no argument-evaluation overhead when off. Root should obtain exact reviewer approval before the VM diagnostic rerun.
Author
Owner

Root installed and launched exact3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68 as the only ~/Applications/Calternal.app. ExecutableSHA56e57a8fc553ce7ce82f6b72dbf04f2e2d442aefb53402b943adca14c208f408; zipSHAa8b1175bc354b455426351b0b7bfc9efb826071ddf0b4b69779cac0add9adb95; strict signature/arm64/Release/revision verified. Prior26eb quit via native menu; rollback retained. Space content inventory matched before/after replacement. Native current app restored the previously open note and Style inspector without editing its content. Receipt .agents/desktop-install/3bbb28a6/install-receipt.json.

User QA preview only. Pass: basic native launch/selection; package lists2/hover1/cross-event3; separate f907event7/7. Fail/open: actual mounted code gutter7assertions, imageFit/Fill4, imageQuickLookgesture8, hostedtitle4allocatoraborts. StyledVMdeeplink did not reach note; nativeUIfallback assigned. Each failure has independent author+reviewer, not closed. No stable or performance acceptance; latest imageprovider repair and diagnostics are NOT in this desktoppreview.

User test focus: centered width and mentions alignment, hover-only six dots, block selection/dragging, cross-event Copy/Move/Cancel/Remember dialog. These UI outcomes remain user acceptance gates.

Root installed and launched exact3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68 as the only ~/Applications/Calternal.app. ExecutableSHA56e57a8fc553ce7ce82f6b72dbf04f2e2d442aefb53402b943adca14c208f408; zipSHAa8b1175bc354b455426351b0b7bfc9efb826071ddf0b4b69779cac0add9adb95; strict signature/arm64/Release/revision verified. Prior26eb quit via native menu; rollback retained. Space content inventory matched before/after replacement. Native current app restored the previously open note and Style inspector without editing its content. Receipt .agents/desktop-install/3bbb28a6/install-receipt.json. User QA preview only. Pass: basic native launch/selection; package lists2/hover1/cross-event3; separate f907event7/7. Fail/open: actual mounted code gutter7assertions, imageFit/Fill4, imageQuickLookgesture8, hostedtitle4allocatoraborts. StyledVMdeeplink did not reach note; nativeUIfallback assigned. Each failure has independent author+reviewer, not closed. No stable or performance acceptance; latest imageprovider repair and diagnostics are NOT in this desktoppreview. User test focus: centered width and mentions alignment, hover-only six dots, block selection/dragging, cross-event Copy/Move/Cancel/Remember dialog. These UI outcomes remain user acceptance gates.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Revision: a07cbb19de6a78dbbff874930975ba989517b1a5
Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run
Verdict: DIAGNOSTIC-ONLY SOURCE PASS

No P1-P3 findings. The call-site if MarkdownCodePaintDiagnostic.enabled now prevents eager evaluation of fragment/container/clip geometry in ordinary drawing. The net d99d751f..a07cbb19 diff retains the original codeSurfaceGeometry.end = containerWidth - padding - frameMinX - 8; rejected cf7c0f87 behavior is absent. Diagnostic output remains geometry-only with no Markdown/source content. Test changes only add coordinate prints; all strict assertions and control flow are unchanged. git diff --check d99d751f..a07cbb19 passes and the worktree is clean.

This is a source gate for an instrumented run, not evidence that the painter is correct at runtime.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Revision: `a07cbb19de6a78dbbff874930975ba989517b1a5` Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run Verdict: **DIAGNOSTIC-ONLY SOURCE PASS** No P1-P3 findings. The call-site `if MarkdownCodePaintDiagnostic.enabled` now prevents eager evaluation of fragment/container/clip geometry in ordinary drawing. The net `d99d751f..a07cbb19` diff retains the original `codeSurfaceGeometry.end = containerWidth - padding - frameMinX - 8`; rejected `cf7c0f87` behavior is absent. Diagnostic output remains geometry-only with no Markdown/source content. Test changes only add coordinate prints; all strict assertions and control flow are unchanged. `git diff --check d99d751f..a07cbb19` passes and the worktree is clean. This is a source gate for an instrumented run, not evidence that the painter is correct at runtime.
Author
Owner

Root next exact centrald5ce608f includes reviewed#12 providercc6a (bb186), #11 geometrydiagnosticsabf3 (5041), #9 guardeddiagnosticsNETd99d..a07c (932e; rejectedgeometrycf7 excluded), #5 structuredcontrol+samepathcontrol through8920 (f463/043e/d5ce). Each candidate source-reviewed; diagnostics preserve strict assertions and avoid user source/URL output. Sole packagecompile pipeline dispatched; subsequent hostedtitlecontrol build remains queued. These newchanges are NOT in desktop3bbb. Runtime rendering and gestures are unproven; earlierfailures explicitly open. Root owns integration/build; authors await exactdiagnosticlogs for decisions.

Root next exact centrald5ce608f includes reviewed#12 providercc6a (bb186), #11 geometrydiagnosticsabf3 (5041), #9 guardeddiagnosticsNETd99d..a07c (932e; rejectedgeometrycf7 excluded), #5 structuredcontrol+samepathcontrol through8920 (f463/043e/d5ce). Each candidate source-reviewed; diagnostics preserve strict assertions and avoid user source/URL output. Sole packagecompile pipeline dispatched; subsequent hostedtitlecontrol build remains queued. These newchanges are NOT in desktop3bbb. Runtime rendering and gestures are unproven; earlierfailures explicitly open. Root owns integration/build; authors await exactdiagnosticlogs for decisions.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/block_drag_finish, isolated integration.
Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb
Branch: wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb
Base: exact 3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68
Status: active, source-only.

Plan: cherry-pick reviewed diagnostic commits 5041add2 (#11 Quick Look gesture coordinates) and 932e17e1 (#9 guarded code-painter geometry) in that order. The candidate explicitly excludes bb186 and all #12 image-provider changes. I will verify clean lineage, net changed paths/patch content, production behavior equivalence outside opt-in diagnostics, and git diff --check; then /root/editor_polish_inventory will review the exact frozen tip. No compiler, test runner, VM, GUI, desktop install, or central checkout mutation is authorized in this task. Root owns the subsequent exact package build and VM diagnostic runs.

Worker/role: `/root/block_drag_finish`, isolated integration. Worktree: `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` Branch: `wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` Base: exact `3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68` Status: active, source-only. Plan: cherry-pick reviewed diagnostic commits `5041add2` (#11 Quick Look gesture coordinates) and `932e17e1` (#9 guarded code-painter geometry) in that order. The candidate explicitly excludes `bb186` and all #12 image-provider changes. I will verify clean lineage, net changed paths/patch content, production behavior equivalence outside opt-in diagnostics, and `git diff --check`; then `/root/editor_polish_inventory` will review the exact frozen tip. No compiler, test runner, VM, GUI, desktop install, or central checkout mutation is authorized in this task. Root owns the subsequent exact package build and VM diagnostic runs.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/block_drag_finish, isolated diagnostics integration.
Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb
Branch: wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb
Frozen candidate: 2c3d934ecd3eb8f4fa0b1a7848a7b7894ae7b38c
Base: 3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68
Status: candidate submitted for exact merged review; source-only.

Applied commits:

  • 532b69a6 = reviewed #11 diagnostic 5041add2; stable patch ID matches 152d454f....
  • 2c3d934e = reviewed #9 guarded diagnostic 932e17e1; stable patch ID matches 436d8983....

Net diff is exactly 67 insertions in three files: BlockEditorView.swift, EditorImageGeometryTests.swift, and CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift. EditorImagePresentation.swift, EditorImageQuickLookController.swift, EditorImageControls.swift, bb186, NSLayoutManagerDelegate, and assumeIsolated are absent. The branch is clean, merge base is exact3bbb, and git diff --check passes. #11 instrumentation is nil-default and typed; #9 geometry collection is guarded at the draw call by CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1; strict test assertions remain. No build, test runtime, GUI, install, or performance result is claimed. /root/editor_polish_inventory now owns exact merged interaction review before root integration/build.

Worker/role: `/root/block_drag_finish`, isolated diagnostics integration. Worktree: `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` Branch: `wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` Frozen candidate: `2c3d934ecd3eb8f4fa0b1a7848a7b7894ae7b38c` Base: `3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68` Status: candidate submitted for exact merged review; source-only. Applied commits: - `532b69a6` = reviewed #11 diagnostic `5041add2`; stable patch ID matches `152d454f...`. - `2c3d934e` = reviewed #9 guarded diagnostic `932e17e1`; stable patch ID matches `436d8983...`. Net diff is exactly 67 insertions in three files: `BlockEditorView.swift`, `EditorImageGeometryTests.swift`, and `CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`. `EditorImagePresentation.swift`, `EditorImageQuickLookController.swift`, `EditorImageControls.swift`, `bb186`, `NSLayoutManagerDelegate`, and `assumeIsolated` are absent. The branch is clean, merge base is exact3bbb, and `git diff --check` passes. #11 instrumentation is nil-default and typed; #9 geometry collection is guarded at the draw call by `CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1`; strict test assertions remain. No build, test runtime, GUI, install, or performance result is claimed. `/root/editor_polish_inventory` now owns exact merged interaction review before root integration/build.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/editor_polish_inventory

Exact isolated candidate: 2c3d934ecd3eb8f4fa0b1a7848a7b7894ae7b38c
Base: 3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68
Worktree: .worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb
Verdict: SOURCE/INTEGRATION PASS — no P1–P3 findings.

The two integrated stable patch IDs exactly match reviewed donors 5041add2 (#11) and 932e17e1 (#9). The #11 callback remains internal and nil by default; argument evaluation and its extra attachment hit lookup occur only when a test installs the callback. Its payload contains window/event/view geometry, click count, and attachment display range only—no source text, asset path, or URL. Existing exact-selection, modifier, count>=2, paired-click identity/revision/range/URL/time/distance, and panel assertions are unchanged.

The #9 product diagnostic is gated by one lazily cached CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC == 1 Boolean. When disabled, the draw path performs only that Boolean branch; container, fragment, gutter, and clip collection/string formatting/logging remain inside the enabled branch. Logged fields are numeric geometry only. Test additions are prints and do not remove, relax, or condition existing assertions.

Net scope is exactly BlockEditorView.swift plus the two diagnostic test files; worktree and git diff --check are clean. Rejected bb186 files/content are absent from the delta, and the resulting image presentation contains no NSTextAttachmentViewProvider/rejected custom provider. No build, tests, GUI, or runtime diagnosis is claimed.

Reviewer: `/root/editor_polish_inventory` Exact isolated candidate: `2c3d934ecd3eb8f4fa0b1a7848a7b7894ae7b38c` Base: `3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68` Worktree: `.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` Verdict: **SOURCE/INTEGRATION PASS — no P1–P3 findings.** The two integrated stable patch IDs exactly match reviewed donors `5041add2` (#11) and `932e17e1` (#9). The #11 callback remains internal and nil by default; argument evaluation and its extra attachment hit lookup occur only when a test installs the callback. Its payload contains window/event/view geometry, click count, and attachment display range only—no source text, asset path, or URL. Existing exact-selection, modifier, count>=2, paired-click identity/revision/range/URL/time/distance, and panel assertions are unchanged. The #9 product diagnostic is gated by one lazily cached `CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC == 1` Boolean. When disabled, the draw path performs only that Boolean branch; container, fragment, gutter, and clip collection/string formatting/logging remain inside the enabled branch. Logged fields are numeric geometry only. Test additions are prints and do not remove, relax, or condition existing assertions. Net scope is exactly `BlockEditorView.swift` plus the two diagnostic test files; worktree and `git diff --check` are clean. Rejected `bb186` files/content are absent from the delta, and the resulting image presentation contains no `NSTextAttachmentViewProvider`/rejected custom provider. No build, tests, GUI, or runtime diagnosis is claimed.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/block_drag_finish, isolated diagnostics integration handoff.
Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb
Branch: wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb
Exact candidate: 2c3d934ecd3eb8f4fa0b1a7848a7b7894ae7b38c
Base: 3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68
Status: SOURCE REVIEW PASS, ready for root integration/build.

/root/editor_polish_inventory reviewed the exact combined delta and found no P1-P3 issues. Stable patch IDs match reviewed 5041add2 (#11) and 932e17e1 (#9); the nil-default #11 callback exposes no source text or URLs; #9 numeric geometry work remains wholly behind the opt-in enabled guard; strict assertions are unchanged. Net files are only BlockEditorView.swift and the two diagnostic tests. bb186 and all #12 provider paths/content are absent. Branch is clean and git diff --check passes. No compiler, runtime test, GUI, install, or performance claim was made by this integration task. Root owns cherry-pick, exact package compile, and VM diagnostic execution with CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1 for #9.

Worker/role: `/root/block_drag_finish`, isolated diagnostics integration handoff. Worktree: `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` Branch: `wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` Exact candidate: `2c3d934ecd3eb8f4fa0b1a7848a7b7894ae7b38c` Base: `3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68` Status: **SOURCE REVIEW PASS**, ready for root integration/build. `/root/editor_polish_inventory` reviewed the exact combined delta and found no P1-P3 issues. Stable patch IDs match reviewed `5041add2` (#11) and `932e17e1` (#9); the nil-default #11 callback exposes no source text or URLs; #9 numeric geometry work remains wholly behind the opt-in enabled guard; strict assertions are unchanged. Net files are only `BlockEditorView.swift` and the two diagnostic tests. `bb186` and all #12 provider paths/content are absent. Branch is clean and `git diff --check` passes. No compiler, runtime test, GUI, install, or performance claim was made by this integration task. Root owns cherry-pick, exact package compile, and VM diagnostic execution with `CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1` for #9.
Author
Owner

Root integration status: desktop preview remains exact 3bbb28a6. Reviewer approved isolated diagnostics 2c3d934ecd for issues #9/#11; optimized package compile now running on agents@mbp, with rejected image provider absent. #5 exact 8920c961 hosted build-for-testing passed and runtime staged to VM; tests not yet executed. #12 sixth SDK provider probe failed optimized compilation at assumeIsolated capture despite narrow Sendable bridge; no product fix accepted. Source author and reviewer are investigating next bounded alternative. VM QA owns native Space routing and styled #4/#6 checks. All runtime and performance gates remain explicit; no issue closed based on source review alone.

Root integration status: desktop preview remains exact 3bbb28a6. Reviewer approved isolated diagnostics 2c3d934ecd3eb8f4fa0b1a7848a7b7894ae7b38c for issues #9/#11; optimized package compile now running on agents@mbp, with rejected image provider absent. #5 exact 8920c961 hosted build-for-testing passed and runtime staged to VM; tests not yet executed. #12 sixth SDK provider probe failed optimized compilation at assumeIsolated capture despite narrow Sendable bridge; no product fix accepted. Source author and reviewer are investigating next bounded alternative. VM QA owns native Space routing and styled #4/#6 checks. All runtime and performance gates remain explicit; no issue closed based on source review alone.
Author
Owner

Root independently verified exact 2c3d934ecd optimized package compilation: status passed, compiler return 0, 32.857 seconds, testsExecuted=false. Build log hash verified b39b27d1f0fcad8c2d68459e1a5cc263bbdb3939efe7b76b89ceae2d8e0e6870. Runtime manifest e3473f8962207ffa40d2c3c15b61562271cd26858dfd018df6d7bcd7ed67137d. /root/title_completion owns immutable VM staging; focused #9/#11 diagnostic runtime follows #5 title controls owned by /root/title_controls_runtime_qa. No renderer or gesture pass claimed until actual runtime results.

Root independently verified exact 2c3d934ecd3eb8f4fa0b1a7848a7b7894ae7b38c optimized package compilation: status passed, compiler return 0, 32.857 seconds, testsExecuted=false. Build log hash verified b39b27d1f0fcad8c2d68459e1a5cc263bbdb3939efe7b76b89ceae2d8e0e6870. Runtime manifest e3473f8962207ffa40d2c3c15b61562271cd26858dfd018df6d7bcd7ed67137d. /root/title_completion owns immutable VM staging; focused #9/#11 diagnostic runtime follows #5 title controls owned by /root/title_controls_runtime_qa. No renderer or gesture pass claimed until actual runtime results.
Author
Owner

Worker /root/title_completion — transfer-only handoff for the combined #9/#11 diagnostics candidate is complete; no test or app process was launched.

  • Exact revision: 2c3d934ecd3eb8f4fa0b1a7848a7b7894ae7b38c
  • Build-host evidence: /Users/agents/Developer/BuildOnly/package-tests-d40/Evidence/package-tests/20260913T175355Z-central-2c3d934e-combined-2c4f7229
  • Package compiler returned 0 in 32.857 seconds; stage helper returned 0. The result records compileOnly: true, swiftTestInvoked: false, xctestInvoked: false, and testsExecuted: false.
  • result.json SHA-256: 23f043d0801b3c5a703bf15cdb0d07b1fd8566082fe00ebaa1944a166847a2e8
  • Swift build log SHA-256: b39b27d1f0fcad8c2d68459e1a5cc263bbdb3939efe7b76b89ceae2d8e0e6870
  • Runtime stage log SHA-256: d133172c779af8d7601128d69a7e7b580f7e57448817e9c8120be162db9ca1b3
  • Bundle inspection SHA-256: 7cca4f89cf263ef11799b19e834f391041b310220d20cb56726899643510ca8c
  • Embedded runtime manifest SHA-256: e3473f8962207ffa40d2c3c15b61562271cd26858dfd018df6d7bcd7ed67137d
  • Package test executable SHA-256: 70982baff04206c2ae054e8a8d09ce70af50a509594e3d09dd96746433ca00c2

I archived the immutable runtime on agents@mbp at /Users/agents/Developer/BuildOnly/package-tests-d40/Evidence/package-tests/20260913T175355Z-central-2c3d934e-combined-2c4f7229/vm-xctest-runtime-2c3d934e-2c4f7229.tar. It is 85,671,936 bytes, mode 0444, SHA-256 911a13164ae96d8ab0e7a60ca20799637c868af5fe7848fc553bf1b5f117069a.

The archive was transferred to a new VM .partial, fully hashed, atomically renamed, and made immutable at /Users/lume/CalternalQA/2c3d934e-diagnostics-runtime/vm-xctest-runtime-2c3d934e-2c4f7229.tar. The VM hash is exactly 911a13164ae96d8ab0e7a60ca20799637c868af5fe7848fc553bf1b5f117069a, mode 0444, size 85,671,936 bytes; no partial remains.

Runtime behavior remains unverified. /root/image_preview_qa owns the VM and has received the exact path and hashes. This is compile/staging evidence only and does not change issue acceptance state.

Worker `/root/title_completion` — transfer-only handoff for the combined #9/#11 diagnostics candidate is complete; **no test or app process was launched**. - Exact revision: `2c3d934ecd3eb8f4fa0b1a7848a7b7894ae7b38c` - Build-host evidence: `/Users/agents/Developer/BuildOnly/package-tests-d40/Evidence/package-tests/20260913T175355Z-central-2c3d934e-combined-2c4f7229` - Package compiler returned 0 in 32.857 seconds; stage helper returned 0. The result records `compileOnly: true`, `swiftTestInvoked: false`, `xctestInvoked: false`, and `testsExecuted: false`. - `result.json` SHA-256: `23f043d0801b3c5a703bf15cdb0d07b1fd8566082fe00ebaa1944a166847a2e8` - Swift build log SHA-256: `b39b27d1f0fcad8c2d68459e1a5cc263bbdb3939efe7b76b89ceae2d8e0e6870` - Runtime stage log SHA-256: `d133172c779af8d7601128d69a7e7b580f7e57448817e9c8120be162db9ca1b3` - Bundle inspection SHA-256: `7cca4f89cf263ef11799b19e834f391041b310220d20cb56726899643510ca8c` - Embedded runtime manifest SHA-256: `e3473f8962207ffa40d2c3c15b61562271cd26858dfd018df6d7bcd7ed67137d` - Package test executable SHA-256: `70982baff04206c2ae054e8a8d09ce70af50a509594e3d09dd96746433ca00c2` I archived the immutable runtime on `agents@mbp` at `/Users/agents/Developer/BuildOnly/package-tests-d40/Evidence/package-tests/20260913T175355Z-central-2c3d934e-combined-2c4f7229/vm-xctest-runtime-2c3d934e-2c4f7229.tar`. It is 85,671,936 bytes, mode `0444`, SHA-256 `911a13164ae96d8ab0e7a60ca20799637c868af5fe7848fc553bf1b5f117069a`. The archive was transferred to a new VM `.partial`, fully hashed, atomically renamed, and made immutable at `/Users/lume/CalternalQA/2c3d934e-diagnostics-runtime/vm-xctest-runtime-2c3d934e-2c4f7229.tar`. The VM hash is exactly `911a13164ae96d8ab0e7a60ca20799637c868af5fe7848fc553bf1b5f117069a`, mode `0444`, size 85,671,936 bytes; no partial remains. Runtime behavior remains unverified. `/root/image_preview_qa` owns the VM and has received the exact path and hashes. This is compile/staging evidence only and does not change issue acceptance state.
Author
Owner

QA / /root/title_controls_runtime_qa starts the next bounded VM-only diagnostics runtime on exact 2c3d934e for #9 and #11 after publishing #5 results.

Scope: verify the staged archive/hash closure, run CalternalEditorTests.CodeBlockPresentationTests with CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1, and run exact mounted-image selector CalternalEditorTests.EditorImageGeometryTests/testMountedEditorHitsExactInlineImageFramesAcrossFragments. Preserve complete diagnostic/geometry traces and test counts under /tmp/qa-runs; no source edits, builds, desktop installation, or user acceptance. Next action: publish VM outcome and trace location for source owners.

QA / `/root/title_controls_runtime_qa` starts the next bounded VM-only diagnostics runtime on exact `2c3d934e` for #9 and #11 after publishing #5 results. Scope: verify the staged archive/hash closure, run `CalternalEditorTests.CodeBlockPresentationTests` with `CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1`, and run exact mounted-image selector `CalternalEditorTests.EditorImageGeometryTests/testMountedEditorHitsExactInlineImageFramesAcrossFragments`. Preserve complete diagnostic/geometry traces and test counts under `/tmp/qa-runs`; no source edits, builds, desktop installation, or user acceptance. Next action: publish VM outcome and trace location for source owners.
Author
Owner

QA / /root/title_controls_runtime_qa — VM diagnostics runtime for exact 2c3d934e is complete; both requested executed gates failed without watchdog timeouts.

Provenance matched before execution: archive /Users/lume/CalternalQA/2c3d934e-diagnostics-runtime/vm-xctest-runtime-2c3d934e-2c4f7229.tar SHA-256 911a13164ae96d8ab0e7a60ca20799637c868af5fe7848fc553bf1b5f117069a; manifest e3473f8962207ffa40d2c3c15b61562271cd26858dfd018df6d7bcd7ed67137d; CalternalPackageTests binary 70982baff04206c2ae054e8a8d09ce70af50a509594e3d09dd96746433ca00c2. VM run root: /private/tmp/qa-2c3d-diagnostics-20260913-232653. Local evidence root: /tmp/qa-runs/20260913-232653-title-controls-8920/.

Test matrix and command outcomes:

Area Happy / edge / adversarial exercise Exact command shape Observed outcome
#9 native code presentation Fence insertion/undo, projection, syntax bounds, unclosed EOF, plus mounted wrapping/gutter/resize adversarial geometry CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1 ... xctest -XCTest CalternalEditorTests.CodeBlockPresentationTests CalternalPackageTests.xctest exit 1; 5 executed / 7 failures / 0 timeout. Four non-mounted tests pass; testMountedCodePainterWrapsAndPaintsSurface fails one missing visible-gutter-ink assertion plus six width assertions. Trace records container/padding, 3 fragment frames/surfaces, logical gutter ranges/baselines, then resized frames/surfaces.
#11 mounted image frame / gesture Multi-fragment exact-image candidate arm, double-click dispatch, retarget and neighboring selection adversarial behavior ... xctest -XCTest CalternalEditorTests.EditorImageGeometryTests/testMountedEditorHitsExactInlineImageFramesAcrossFragments CalternalPackageTests.xctest exit 1; 1 executed / 8 failures / 0 timeout. Expected candidate {47,1} is not armed, selection remains {138,0}, expected dispatch is nil; second expected {130,1} dispatch also absent. Gesture trace: double-click at view point (95.79541015625,140.0) yields targetRange:nil; later single click at (217.79541015625,140.0) has hover target {47,1}.

Full command/provenance/summary: 24-2c3d-vm-console.txt. Complete selector logs and status records: 25-2c3d-full-logs.txt. The original full VM logs remain under the VM run root above. No source data appears in the diagnostics retained here; traces are geometry/range/value records. No product edits, desktop launch, UI screenshot review, performance test, or user acceptance occurred.

Required validation: code owner must repair the mounted gutter/width model and rerun the whole CodeBlockPresentationTests class with CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1 to 5 executed / 0 failure. Image owner must repair the target-range/coordinate route and rerun the exact mounted selector to 1 executed / 0 failure, then run the required native Quick Look retarget/Escape/close checks. The current VM run is direct package XCTest runtime evidence only.

Recommendation: FAIL / #9 and #11 runtime acceptance blocked. Next owners: /root/code_block_polish for code geometry trace, /root/image_preview_native_repair for mounted-image trace. Retain fixture and direct VM package runner; no production-cause claim is made beyond the observed assertions.

QA / `/root/title_controls_runtime_qa` — VM diagnostics runtime for exact `2c3d934e` is complete; both requested executed gates failed without watchdog timeouts. Provenance matched before execution: archive `/Users/lume/CalternalQA/2c3d934e-diagnostics-runtime/vm-xctest-runtime-2c3d934e-2c4f7229.tar` SHA-256 `911a13164ae96d8ab0e7a60ca20799637c868af5fe7848fc553bf1b5f117069a`; manifest `e3473f8962207ffa40d2c3c15b61562271cd26858dfd018df6d7bcd7ed67137d`; `CalternalPackageTests` binary `70982baff04206c2ae054e8a8d09ce70af50a509594e3d09dd96746433ca00c2`. VM run root: `/private/tmp/qa-2c3d-diagnostics-20260913-232653`. Local evidence root: `/tmp/qa-runs/20260913-232653-title-controls-8920/`. Test matrix and command outcomes: | Area | Happy / edge / adversarial exercise | Exact command shape | Observed outcome | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | #9 native code presentation | Fence insertion/undo, projection, syntax bounds, unclosed EOF, plus mounted wrapping/gutter/resize adversarial geometry | `CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1 ... xctest -XCTest CalternalEditorTests.CodeBlockPresentationTests CalternalPackageTests.xctest` | exit 1; **5 executed / 7 failures / 0 timeout**. Four non-mounted tests pass; `testMountedCodePainterWrapsAndPaintsSurface` fails one missing visible-gutter-ink assertion plus six width assertions. Trace records container/padding, 3 fragment frames/surfaces, logical gutter ranges/baselines, then resized frames/surfaces. | | #11 mounted image frame / gesture | Multi-fragment exact-image candidate arm, double-click dispatch, retarget and neighboring selection adversarial behavior | `... xctest -XCTest CalternalEditorTests.EditorImageGeometryTests/testMountedEditorHitsExactInlineImageFramesAcrossFragments CalternalPackageTests.xctest` | exit 1; **1 executed / 8 failures / 0 timeout**. Expected candidate `{47,1}` is not armed, selection remains `{138,0}`, expected dispatch is nil; second expected `{130,1}` dispatch also absent. Gesture trace: double-click at view point `(95.79541015625,140.0)` yields `targetRange:nil`; later single click at `(217.79541015625,140.0)` has hover target `{47,1}`. | Full command/provenance/summary: `24-2c3d-vm-console.txt`. Complete selector logs and status records: `25-2c3d-full-logs.txt`. The original full VM logs remain under the VM run root above. No source data appears in the diagnostics retained here; traces are geometry/range/value records. No product edits, desktop launch, UI screenshot review, performance test, or user acceptance occurred. Required validation: code owner must repair the mounted gutter/width model and rerun the whole `CodeBlockPresentationTests` class with `CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1` to 5 executed / 0 failure. Image owner must repair the target-range/coordinate route and rerun the exact mounted selector to 1 executed / 0 failure, then run the required native Quick Look retarget/Escape/close checks. The current VM run is direct package XCTest runtime evidence only. Recommendation: **FAIL / #9 and #11 runtime acceptance blocked.** Next owners: `/root/code_block_polish` for code geometry trace, `/root/image_preview_native_repair` for mounted-image trace. Retain fixture and direct VM package runner; no production-cause claim is made beyond the observed assertions.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish
Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish
Branch: wave16/code-block-polish
State: instrumentation-only candidate ready for exact source review and VM rerun
Commit: ccea08dcb1

Diagnosis:

  • The 2c3d VM log contains test-side fragment/surface/gutter traces but no captured EditorCodeDiagnostic draw records.
  • Therefore the prior runtime evidence does not establish the NSTextLayoutFragment draw-point contract or prove a production geometry cause. I am stopping geometry guesses and adding bounded native-entry/surface/number traces.

Change:

  • Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift: when CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1, print numeric-only records at renderingSurfaceBounds, draw(at:in:), and each line-number draw. Records include fragment frame, superclass/custom surface bounds, computed surface geometry, draw point, clip, number rect/baseline, and gutter geometry. Normal draws keep the existing one-Boolean diagnostic gate and do no extra work.
  • No assertions, coordinate expectations, or production geometry formulas were changed. The rejected cf7c0f87 endpoint behavior remains absent.

Validation:

  • git diff --check passed.
  • No local build, package test, GUI, or VM run per ownership rules.

Next action:

  • Root should obtain exact ui_fixes_review_medium review for frozen ccea08d and, if accepted, rerun CodeBlockPresentationTests with CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1 while retaining the complete stdout/console and bitmap evidence.
Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish Branch: wave16/code-block-polish State: instrumentation-only candidate ready for exact source review and VM rerun Commit: ccea08dcb1e08d2bbab796a9a3b54d766498708c Diagnosis: - The 2c3d VM log contains test-side fragment/surface/gutter traces but no captured EditorCodeDiagnostic draw records. - Therefore the prior runtime evidence does not establish the NSTextLayoutFragment draw-point contract or prove a production geometry cause. I am stopping geometry guesses and adding bounded native-entry/surface/number traces. Change: - Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift: when CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1, print numeric-only records at renderingSurfaceBounds, draw(at:in:), and each line-number draw. Records include fragment frame, superclass/custom surface bounds, computed surface geometry, draw point, clip, number rect/baseline, and gutter geometry. Normal draws keep the existing one-Boolean diagnostic gate and do no extra work. - No assertions, coordinate expectations, or production geometry formulas were changed. The rejected cf7c0f87 endpoint behavior remains absent. Validation: - git diff --check passed. - No local build, package test, GUI, or VM run per ownership rules. Next action: - Root should obtain exact ui_fixes_review_medium review for frozen ccea08d and, if accepted, rerun CodeBlockPresentationTests with CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1 while retaining the complete stdout/console and bitmap evidence.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Exact candidate: ccea08dcb1e08d2bbab796a9a3b54d766498708c
Parent: a07cbb19de6a78dbbff874930975ba989517b1a5
Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run
Verdict: DIAGNOSTIC-ONLY SOURCE PASS

No P1-P3 findings. Every added collection site is guarded by MarkdownCodePaintDiagnostic.enabled before formatting or geometry extraction. The surface hook records layout/super/effective surface bounds and computed geometry; draw entry records point/frame/effective surface/clip; the gutter hook records line-number value and its actual point-space rectangle. Output contains geometry and ordinal line numbers only, with no Markdown/source text, URL, or token content. Normal disabled drawing performs only static Boolean checks; the earlier eager-argument issue remains fixed.

The net production geometry still uses containerWidth - padding - layoutFragmentFrame.minX - 8; rejected cf7c0f87 behavior is absent. ccea08dc changes no test file, and the cumulative diagnostic test changes remain print-only with strict assertions unchanged. git diff --check a07cbb19..ccea08dc passes and the worktree is clean. This is only a source gate for the instrumented VM run; it does not establish painter correctness.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Exact candidate: `ccea08dcb1e08d2bbab796a9a3b54d766498708c` Parent: `a07cbb19de6a78dbbff874930975ba989517b1a5` Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run Verdict: **DIAGNOSTIC-ONLY SOURCE PASS** No P1-P3 findings. Every added collection site is guarded by `MarkdownCodePaintDiagnostic.enabled` before formatting or geometry extraction. The surface hook records layout/super/effective surface bounds and computed geometry; draw entry records point/frame/effective surface/clip; the gutter hook records line-number value and its actual point-space rectangle. Output contains geometry and ordinal line numbers only, with no Markdown/source text, URL, or token content. Normal disabled drawing performs only static Boolean checks; the earlier eager-argument issue remains fixed. The net production geometry still uses `containerWidth - padding - layoutFragmentFrame.minX - 8`; rejected `cf7c0f87` behavior is absent. `ccea08dc` changes no test file, and the cumulative diagnostic test changes remain print-only with strict assertions unchanged. `git diff --check a07cbb19..ccea08dc` passes and the worktree is clean. This is only a source gate for the instrumented VM run; it does not establish painter correctness.
Author
Owner

Worker /root/block_drag_finish integration status: reviewed #9 instrumentation ccea08dc is now applied as ce2100f0 atop the pre-reviewed #11 intermediate d46b02e9 in .worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb. Cherry-pick was clean. Existing production geometry formulas and strict tests remain unchanged; collection/formatting stays inside the opt-in CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1 guards. Current branch is clean and diff-check passes. This is deliberately not the final build candidate: the #9 owner is preparing the bounded coordinate-assertion follow-up requested by root, and I am waiting to integrate that exact reviewed commit before one combined final review/build. No compiler/runtime/GUI claim.

Worker `/root/block_drag_finish` integration status: reviewed #9 instrumentation `ccea08dc` is now applied as `ce2100f0` atop the pre-reviewed #11 intermediate `d46b02e9` in `.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb`. Cherry-pick was clean. Existing production geometry formulas and strict tests remain unchanged; collection/formatting stays inside the opt-in `CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC=1` guards. Current branch is clean and diff-check passes. This is deliberately not the final build candidate: the #9 owner is preparing the bounded coordinate-assertion follow-up requested by root, and I am waiting to integrate that exact reviewed commit before one combined final review/build. No compiler/runtime/GUI claim.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish
Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish
Branch: wave16/code-block-polish
State: bounded mounted-test coordinate fix ready for exact reviewer
Base: ccea08dcb1
Candidate: 9da8508028

Finding:
Apple's NSTextLayoutFragment.renderingSurfaceBounds is local to layoutFragmentFrame. The prior assertions added only textContainerOrigin.x, omitting fragment.layoutFragmentFrame.minX. The VM values 128/126 versus 177 differ by the observed frame origin (~51), confirming a coordinate conversion defect in the test.

Change:

  • Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift: add layoutFragmentFrame.minX to both initial and resized target-space conversions.
  • Account explicitly for NSTextLayoutFragment's decorated bounds being the union of the code surface and native body glyph bounds: expected max is max(live code-surface endpoint, fragment-origin + finite typographic body max). This preserves the strict ±2 assertion and detects surface overrun while allowing the documented superclass bounds contribution.
  • Gutter bitmap ink assertions, exactly-three logical rows, seam sampling, resize growth, and empty-EOF mounted checks are unchanged.

Validation:

  • git diff --check passed.
  • No local build, package tests, GUI, or VM run per root ownership rules.

Next action:

  • Obtain exact ui_fixes_review_medium review of frozen 9da85080, then root may batch it with reviewed diagnostics for the next package/VM run.
Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish Branch: wave16/code-block-polish State: bounded mounted-test coordinate fix ready for exact reviewer Base: ccea08dcb1e08d2bbab796a9a3b54d766498708c Candidate: 9da85080286518e3a0868615c8fd69ddbd979338 Finding: Apple's NSTextLayoutFragment.renderingSurfaceBounds is local to layoutFragmentFrame. The prior assertions added only textContainerOrigin.x, omitting fragment.layoutFragmentFrame.minX. The VM values 128/126 versus 177 differ by the observed frame origin (~51), confirming a coordinate conversion defect in the test. Change: - Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift: add layoutFragmentFrame.minX to both initial and resized target-space conversions. - Account explicitly for NSTextLayoutFragment's decorated bounds being the union of the code surface and native body glyph bounds: expected max is max(live code-surface endpoint, fragment-origin + finite typographic body max). This preserves the strict ±2 assertion and detects surface overrun while allowing the documented superclass bounds contribution. - Gutter bitmap ink assertions, exactly-three logical rows, seam sampling, resize growth, and empty-EOF mounted checks are unchanged. Validation: - git diff --check passed. - No local build, package tests, GUI, or VM run per root ownership rules. Next action: - Obtain exact ui_fixes_review_medium review of frozen 9da85080, then root may batch it with reviewed diagnostics for the next package/VM run.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Exact candidate: 9da85080286518e3a0868615c8fd69ddbd979338
Parent: ccea08dcb1e08d2bbab796a9a3b54d766498708c
Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run
Verdict: SOURCE FAIL (P2 test-contract gap)

P2 — typographicBounds.maxX is not the native rendering extent and max(...) can mask a short panel

  1. Location: Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:276-288 and the resized duplicate at :317-329.
  2. What can break: the mounted regression can still fail for correct TextKit output when glyph ink overhang extends beyond a line's typographic bounds. Conversely, when a long line's body extent exceeds the desired panel endpoint, max(expectedSurfaceMaxX, bodyMaxX) makes the equality insensitive to whether the custom code surface actually reaches expectedSurfaceMaxX; the native body can satisfy the assertion by itself.
  3. Why likely: NSTextLayoutFragment.renderingSurfaceBounds is fragment-local and represents rendered ink/decorations. NSTextLineFragment.typographicBounds is also fragment-local, but its typographic max is not an authoritative glyph-ink/rendering max. The prior hosted mismatch (rendering max extending beyond the derived typographic body max) is consistent with that distinction. Adding fragmentOriginX corrects the coordinate space, but deriving an exact decorated rendering bound from typographic bounds remains invalid. The wrapped long-line fixture also makes body content likely to dominate the max, weakening the custom panel endpoint check.
  4. Scoped fix: keep the fragmentOriginX + renderingSurfaceBounds.maxX coordinate correction, but do not assert exact equality to a typographic approximation. Assert the decorated rendering bound reaches at least the expected panel endpoint, then verify the panel itself with bitmap samples on a glyph-free row at/just inside expectedSurfaceMaxX (semantic surface color) and immediately beyond the intended endpoint (background, allowing the rounded top/bottom corners by choosing an interior row). Repeat after resize. This directly proves the custom surface endpoint while allowing native glyph ink overhang. Retain the existing per-logical-row gutter scan, seam checks, empty-fence height, and bounded resize assertions unchanged.

The candidate is correctly test-only and fixes the omitted fragment origin. It does not alter gutter scans, seam/EOF checks, or production code, and git diff --check ccea08dc..9da85080 passes. Re-review is required because the exact right-edge contract remains both flaky and incomplete.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Exact candidate: `9da85080286518e3a0868615c8fd69ddbd979338` Parent: `ccea08dcb1e08d2bbab796a9a3b54d766498708c` Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run Verdict: **SOURCE FAIL (P2 test-contract gap)** ### P2 — `typographicBounds.maxX` is not the native rendering extent and `max(...)` can mask a short panel 1. **Location:** `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:276-288` and the resized duplicate at `:317-329`. 2. **What can break:** the mounted regression can still fail for correct TextKit output when glyph ink overhang extends beyond a line's typographic bounds. Conversely, when a long line's body extent exceeds the desired panel endpoint, `max(expectedSurfaceMaxX, bodyMaxX)` makes the equality insensitive to whether the custom code surface actually reaches `expectedSurfaceMaxX`; the native body can satisfy the assertion by itself. 3. **Why likely:** `NSTextLayoutFragment.renderingSurfaceBounds` is fragment-local and represents rendered ink/decorations. `NSTextLineFragment.typographicBounds` is also fragment-local, but its typographic max is not an authoritative glyph-ink/rendering max. The prior hosted mismatch (rendering max extending beyond the derived typographic body max) is consistent with that distinction. Adding `fragmentOriginX` corrects the coordinate space, but deriving an exact decorated rendering bound from typographic bounds remains invalid. The wrapped long-line fixture also makes body content likely to dominate the `max`, weakening the custom panel endpoint check. 4. **Scoped fix:** keep the `fragmentOriginX + renderingSurfaceBounds.maxX` coordinate correction, but do not assert exact equality to a typographic approximation. Assert the decorated rendering bound reaches at least the expected panel endpoint, then verify the panel itself with bitmap samples on a glyph-free row at/just inside `expectedSurfaceMaxX` (semantic surface color) and immediately beyond the intended endpoint (background, allowing the rounded top/bottom corners by choosing an interior row). Repeat after resize. This directly proves the custom surface endpoint while allowing native glyph ink overhang. Retain the existing per-logical-row gutter scan, seam checks, empty-fence height, and bounded resize assertions unchanged. The candidate is correctly test-only and fixes the omitted fragment origin. It does not alter gutter scans, seam/EOF checks, or production code, and `git diff --check ccea08dc..9da85080` passes. Re-review is required because the exact right-edge contract remains both flaky and incomplete.
Author
Owner

Worker /root/block_drag_finish integration gate update: #9 candidate 9da85080 was not integrated. /root/ui_fixes_review_medium rejected it P2: fragment-origin conversion is correct, but typographic max is not rendered glyph ink and max(body,panel) can mask a too-short code surface. The integration branch remains clean at ce2100f0, containing only reviewed ccea diagnostics plus the pre-reviewed #11 cumulative adaptation. Final combined review/build remains held until the #9 owner supplies a corrected source-reviewed assertion using a lower-bound rendered extent and direct glyph-free interior bitmap edge evidence before/after resize. No build/runtime/GUI action.

Worker `/root/block_drag_finish` integration gate update: #9 candidate `9da85080` was **not integrated**. `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` rejected it P2: fragment-origin conversion is correct, but typographic max is not rendered glyph ink and `max(body,panel)` can mask a too-short code surface. The integration branch remains clean at `ce2100f0`, containing only reviewed ccea diagnostics plus the pre-reviewed #11 cumulative adaptation. Final combined review/build remains held until the #9 owner supplies a corrected source-reviewed assertion using a lower-bound rendered extent and direct glyph-free interior bitmap edge evidence before/after resize. No build/runtime/GUI action.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish
Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish
Branch: wave16/code-block-polish
State: atomic mounted-test visual endpoint candidate ready for exact reviewer
Base: 9da8508028
Candidate: 710a8d30df

Review response:
The prior coordinate conversion was correct, but using typographic bounds as a proxy for the superclass glyph render extent allowed max(...) to mask an undersized code surface. This candidate removes that proxy.

Changes:

  • Replace decorated-bound equality against a typographic-derived expected value with a direct requirement that each fragment's target-space renderingSurfaceBounds reaches the intended live endpoint.
  • Add native bitmap assertions at a glyph-free row: sample two pixels inside the endpoint and two pixels beyond it, compare the inside pixel to the resolved semantic surface color, and require the outside pixel to differ.
  • Repeat the endpoint bitmap proof after resize using a freshly sized native bitmap/cacheDisplay.
  • Retain gutter ink, exactly-three logical rows, seam continuity, resize growth, and mounted empty-EOF checks unchanged.
  • No production code or geometry formulas changed.

Validation:

  • git diff --check passed.
  • No local build, package tests, GUI, or VM run per root ownership rules.

Next action:

  • Exact ui_fixes_review_medium review of frozen 710a8d30, followed by root's package/VM validation.
Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish Branch: wave16/code-block-polish State: atomic mounted-test visual endpoint candidate ready for exact reviewer Base: 9da85080286518e3a0868615c8fd69ddbd979338 Candidate: 710a8d30dfb31274bf56f114ba03c35cabe9a646 Review response: The prior coordinate conversion was correct, but using typographic bounds as a proxy for the superclass glyph render extent allowed max(...) to mask an undersized code surface. This candidate removes that proxy. Changes: - Replace decorated-bound equality against a typographic-derived expected value with a direct requirement that each fragment's target-space renderingSurfaceBounds reaches the intended live endpoint. - Add native bitmap assertions at a glyph-free row: sample two pixels inside the endpoint and two pixels beyond it, compare the inside pixel to the resolved semantic surface color, and require the outside pixel to differ. - Repeat the endpoint bitmap proof after resize using a freshly sized native bitmap/cacheDisplay. - Retain gutter ink, exactly-three logical rows, seam continuity, resize growth, and mounted empty-EOF checks unchanged. - No production code or geometry formulas changed. Validation: - git diff --check passed. - No local build, package tests, GUI, or VM run per root ownership rules. Next action: - Exact ui_fixes_review_medium review of frozen 710a8d30, followed by root's package/VM validation.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Exact candidate: 710a8d30dfb31274bf56f114ba03c35cabe9a646
Parent chain reviewed: ccea08dc → 9da85080 → 710a8d30
Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run
Verdict: SOURCE FAIL (P2 bitmap-probe reliability)

P2 — the endpoint row is not proven glyph-free, so text can create both false failures and false passes

  1. Location: Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:286-298 and resized reuse at :343-351.
  2. What can break: correct surfaces can fail when a glyph covers the inside pixel; an overlong or short surface can pass when body glyph ink makes the two sampled colors differ. The resize check reuses the same unproved Y and has the same ambiguity.
  3. Why likely: endpointY = textContainerOrigin.y + 40 is unrelated to any NSTextLineFragment bounds. The fixture's first logical line is intentionally long and wraps densely, so that row is likely within text ink. The code surface ends eight points before the text-container padding edge, while normal code glyphs may legally occupy that remaining body width. Therefore expectedSurfaceMaxX + 2 is outside the panel but still inside the text layout area. XCTAssertFalse(endpointInside.isEqual(endpointOutside)) cannot distinguish an actual background transition from glyph ink or antialiasing. The manually allocated bitmap is one pixel per point here, so the ±2 conversion is internally consistent, but it does not solve content contamination.
  4. Scoped fix: make the probe row authoritative. Add or use an explicitly blank logical code line, find its actual NSTextLineFragment, and derive a Y inside that line's vertical band away from the block's rounded top/bottom corners. Sample the endpoint at that Y before and after resize. Compare the inside pixel to the resolved semantic surface with tolerance and the outside pixel to the resolved editor/text background with tolerance, rather than only asserting the two NSColor objects are unequal. Keep the new fragmentOriginX + renderingSurfaceBounds.maxX >= expected endpoint checks, exact numbered-row/gutter scans, seam checks, empty-fence height, and resize growth assertions unchanged.

The change correctly removes invalid exact equality to typographic bounds and preserves the fragment-origin conversion. It is test-only and git diff --check 9da85080..710a8d30 passes, but the right-edge probe is not yet deterministic enough to gate the painter.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Exact candidate: `710a8d30dfb31274bf56f114ba03c35cabe9a646` Parent chain reviewed: `ccea08dc` → `9da85080` → `710a8d30` Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run Verdict: **SOURCE FAIL (P2 bitmap-probe reliability)** ### P2 — the endpoint row is not proven glyph-free, so text can create both false failures and false passes 1. **Location:** `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:286-298` and resized reuse at `:343-351`. 2. **What can break:** correct surfaces can fail when a glyph covers the inside pixel; an overlong or short surface can pass when body glyph ink makes the two sampled colors differ. The resize check reuses the same unproved Y and has the same ambiguity. 3. **Why likely:** `endpointY = textContainerOrigin.y + 40` is unrelated to any `NSTextLineFragment` bounds. The fixture's first logical line is intentionally long and wraps densely, so that row is likely within text ink. The code surface ends eight points before the text-container padding edge, while normal code glyphs may legally occupy that remaining body width. Therefore `expectedSurfaceMaxX + 2` is outside the panel but still inside the text layout area. `XCTAssertFalse(endpointInside.isEqual(endpointOutside))` cannot distinguish an actual background transition from glyph ink or antialiasing. The manually allocated bitmap is one pixel per point here, so the ±2 conversion is internally consistent, but it does not solve content contamination. 4. **Scoped fix:** make the probe row authoritative. Add or use an explicitly blank logical code line, find its actual `NSTextLineFragment`, and derive a Y inside that line's vertical band away from the block's rounded top/bottom corners. Sample the endpoint at that Y before and after resize. Compare the inside pixel to the resolved semantic surface with tolerance and the outside pixel to the resolved editor/text background with tolerance, rather than only asserting the two `NSColor` objects are unequal. Keep the new `fragmentOriginX + renderingSurfaceBounds.maxX >= expected endpoint` checks, exact numbered-row/gutter scans, seam checks, empty-fence height, and resize growth assertions unchanged. The change correctly removes invalid exact equality to typographic bounds and preserves the fragment-origin conversion. It is test-only and `git diff --check 9da85080..710a8d30` passes, but the right-edge probe is not yet deterministic enough to gate the painter.
Author
Owner

Integration gate update from /root/block_drag_finish: corrected #9 test candidate 710a8d30 was not integrated after reviewer P2. Its chosen endpoint Y is arbitrary within densely wrapped text and the +2 sample remains within text-body width, so glyph ink can contaminate both colors and inequality can false-pass an overrun. The integration branch stays clean at ce2100f0. Awaiting an exact reviewed follow-up that derives Y from an actual blank code line and compares inside surface/outside background with explicit tolerances before and after resize. No build/runtime/GUI action.

Integration gate update from `/root/block_drag_finish`: corrected #9 test candidate `710a8d30` was **not integrated** after reviewer P2. Its chosen endpoint Y is arbitrary within densely wrapped text and the +2 sample remains within text-body width, so glyph ink can contaminate both colors and inequality can false-pass an overrun. The integration branch stays clean at `ce2100f0`. Awaiting an exact reviewed follow-up that derives Y from an actual blank code line and compares inside surface/outside background with explicit tolerances before and after resize. No build/runtime/GUI action.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish
Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish
Branch: wave16/code-block-polish
State: mounted-test endpoint proof updated; exact reviewer requested
Base: 710a8d30df
Candidate: 7eb24dd625

Review fix:

  • Removed arbitrary endpointY = origin + 40, which could land in dense wrapped glyph rows.
  • Added an explicit blank logical code line to the mounted fixture.
  • Derive the sampling band from that line's realized textLineFragment typographic bounds and glyph origin, both before and after resize.
  • The test now expects four logical starts/gutter rows.
  • Endpoint samples still compare just-inside to the resolved semantic code surface and just-beyond to the resolved editor background, before and after resize.
  • Existing seam, resize-growth, gutter-ink, and mounted empty-EOF assertions remain.

Validation: git diff --check passed. No local build, package tests, GUI, or VM run per root ownership rules.

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish Branch: wave16/code-block-polish State: mounted-test endpoint proof updated; exact reviewer requested Base: 710a8d30dfb31274bf56f114ba03c35cabe9a646 Candidate: 7eb24dd62576e6920cd1c54d113c08d2dd09a7a8 Review fix: - Removed arbitrary endpointY = origin + 40, which could land in dense wrapped glyph rows. - Added an explicit blank logical code line to the mounted fixture. - Derive the sampling band from that line's realized textLineFragment typographic bounds and glyph origin, both before and after resize. - The test now expects four logical starts/gutter rows. - Endpoint samples still compare just-inside to the resolved semantic code surface and just-beyond to the resolved editor background, before and after resize. - Existing seam, resize-growth, gutter-ink, and mounted empty-EOF assertions remain. Validation: git diff --check passed. No local build, package tests, GUI, or VM run per root ownership rules.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Exact candidate: 7eb24dd62576e6920cd1c54d113c08d2dd09a7a8
Parent chain reviewed: ccea08dc → 9da85080 → 710a8d30 → 7eb24dd6
Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run
Verdict: SOURCE FAIL (P2 sampling-coordinate error)

P2 — the blank-line band double-applies the glyph offset and clamps failures into unrelated pixels

  1. Location: Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:299-306 and resized duplicate at :375-382.
  2. What can break: the supposedly glyph-free endpoint probe can sample the next visual line or another unrelated row. A correct panel may fail because that row contains glyph ink; a wrong panel may pass. If the computed Y falls outside the bitmap, min/max silently samples row 0 or height - 1, masking the geometry error instead of failing the test.
  3. Why likely: AppKit defines NSTextLineFragment.typographicBounds as the line fragment's layout dimensions, with its origin offset in the parent layout-fragment group. glyphOrigin is the rendering origin for glyphs inside the line-fragment coordinate system. The vertical band is therefore layoutFragmentFrame.minY + typographicBounds.minY ... maxY; adding glyphOrigin.y and then half of typographicBounds.height shifts the band toward/through the baseline rather than selecting its center. The same incorrect formula is repeated after resize.
  4. Scoped fix: compute both blank-row sample Ys as textContainerOrigin.y + fragment.layoutFragmentFrame.minY + line.typographicBounds.midY, without glyphOrigin.y. Assert that the resulting rounded Y is within 0..<bitmapHeight and fail if not; do not clamp it. Keep the exact blank-line lookup, four-logical-row/gutter requirement, lower-bound surface extent, semantic surface/background color tolerances, seam checks, resize growth, and empty-EOF assertion unchanged.

The explicit blank logical line is otherwise a sound way to avoid endpoint glyph contamination: it has a projected newline with code metadata, characterRange.location == 0, nonzero attributed length, and whitespace-only content. The expected colors are resolved under editor.effectiveAppearance in device RGB, matching the production surface formula and the editor's NSColor.textBackgroundColor. The ±2 point samples are consistent with this test's one-pixel-per-point cache bitmap. git diff --check 710a8d30..7eb24dd6 passes; only the test changes.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Exact candidate: `7eb24dd62576e6920cd1c54d113c08d2dd09a7a8` Parent chain reviewed: `ccea08dc` → `9da85080` → `710a8d30` → `7eb24dd6` Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run Verdict: **SOURCE FAIL (P2 sampling-coordinate error)** ### P2 — the blank-line band double-applies the glyph offset and clamps failures into unrelated pixels 1. **Location:** `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:299-306` and resized duplicate at `:375-382`. 2. **What can break:** the supposedly glyph-free endpoint probe can sample the next visual line or another unrelated row. A correct panel may fail because that row contains glyph ink; a wrong panel may pass. If the computed Y falls outside the bitmap, `min/max` silently samples row `0` or `height - 1`, masking the geometry error instead of failing the test. 3. **Why likely:** AppKit defines `NSTextLineFragment.typographicBounds` as the line fragment's layout dimensions, with its origin offset in the parent layout-fragment group. `glyphOrigin` is the rendering origin for glyphs inside the line-fragment coordinate system. The vertical band is therefore `layoutFragmentFrame.minY + typographicBounds.minY ... maxY`; adding `glyphOrigin.y` and then half of `typographicBounds.height` shifts the band toward/through the baseline rather than selecting its center. The same incorrect formula is repeated after resize. 4. **Scoped fix:** compute both blank-row sample Ys as `textContainerOrigin.y + fragment.layoutFragmentFrame.minY + line.typographicBounds.midY`, without `glyphOrigin.y`. Assert that the resulting rounded Y is within `0..<bitmapHeight` and fail if not; do not clamp it. Keep the exact blank-line lookup, four-logical-row/gutter requirement, lower-bound surface extent, semantic surface/background color tolerances, seam checks, resize growth, and empty-EOF assertion unchanged. The explicit blank logical line is otherwise a sound way to avoid endpoint glyph contamination: it has a projected newline with code metadata, `characterRange.location == 0`, nonzero attributed length, and whitespace-only content. The expected colors are resolved under `editor.effectiveAppearance` in device RGB, matching the production surface formula and the editor's `NSColor.textBackgroundColor`. The ±2 point samples are consistent with this test's one-pixel-per-point cache bitmap. `git diff --check 710a8d30..7eb24dd6` passes; only the test changes.
Author
Owner

Integration gate update from /root/block_drag_finish: #9 candidate 7eb24dd6 was not integrated after reviewer P2. The explicit blank code line is sound, but its sample Y double-applies glyphOrigin.y; clamping could then hide an out-of-bitmap error. The branch remains clean at ce2100f0. Awaiting a reviewed correction using textContainerOrigin.y + layoutFragmentFrame.minY + typographicBounds.midY, with an explicit in-bounds assertion and no clamp, before and after resize. Final dependency remains: #9 corrected test + existing ccea diagnostics and #11 cumulative diagnostics receive one combined review before root may integrate onto f831. No build/runtime/GUI action.

Integration gate update from `/root/block_drag_finish`: #9 candidate `7eb24dd6` was **not integrated** after reviewer P2. The explicit blank code line is sound, but its sample Y double-applies `glyphOrigin.y`; clamping could then hide an out-of-bitmap error. The branch remains clean at `ce2100f0`. Awaiting a reviewed correction using `textContainerOrigin.y + layoutFragmentFrame.minY + typographicBounds.midY`, with an explicit in-bounds assertion and no clamp, before and after resize. Final dependency remains: #9 corrected test + existing ccea diagnostics and #11 cumulative diagnostics receive one combined review before root may integrate onto f831. No build/runtime/GUI action.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish
Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish
Branch: wave16/code-block-polish
State: final review correction ready for exact review
Base: 7eb24dd625
Candidate: 4281427b81

Fix:

  • Pre- and post-resize endpoint sample Y now uses exactly textContainerOrigin.y + layoutFragmentFrame.minY + typographicBounds.midY.
  • Removed glyphOrigin from this vertical coordinate to avoid double counting.
  • Removed clamping; each derived Y is asserted to be inside the native bitmap before sampling.
  • All other fixture, logical-row, gutter, seam, resize, and EOF assertions are unchanged.

Validation: git diff --check passed. No local build, package tests, GUI, or VM run per root ownership rules.

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish Branch: wave16/code-block-polish State: final review correction ready for exact review Base: 7eb24dd62576e6920cd1c54d113c08d2dd09a7a8 Candidate: 4281427b811a4a99c2798375a50a99dbc65d13b4 Fix: - Pre- and post-resize endpoint sample Y now uses exactly textContainerOrigin.y + layoutFragmentFrame.minY + typographicBounds.midY. - Removed glyphOrigin from this vertical coordinate to avoid double counting. - Removed clamping; each derived Y is asserted to be inside the native bitmap before sampling. - All other fixture, logical-row, gutter, seam, resize, and EOF assertions are unchanged. Validation: git diff --check passed. No local build, package tests, GUI, or VM run per root ownership rules.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Exact candidate: 4281427b811a4a99c2798375a50a99dbc65d13b4
Cumulative range reviewed: a07cbb19..4281427b
Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run
Verdict: SOURCE FAIL (P2 edge-color discriminator)

P2 — independent 0.25 tolerances can accept the surface as background

  1. Location: Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:307-315 and resized duplicate at :379-386.
  2. What can break: a code surface that paints past its intended endpoint can still pass the outside-background assertion, especially in an appearance where the deliberately subtle semantic surface is close to textBackgroundColor.
  3. Why likely: the test accepts the inside pixel when its summed RGB distance from the surface is below 0.25, and independently accepts the outside pixel when its distance from the background is below 0.25. It never requires either pixel to be closer to its intended color than to the other semantic color. The production surface is derived by low-fraction blends of control background and separator into text background, so the surface/background distance is appearance-dependent and can fall inside the fixed outside tolerance. In that case a pixel equal to the overlong surface has a background distance under 0.25 and passes. The same overlap exists after resize.
  4. Scoped fix: retain the existing absolute checks, and add relative discrimination for both samples at both sizes: inside must be closer to expectedSurface than to expectedBackground; outside must be closer to expectedBackground than to expectedSurface. Compute the same summed RGB distances already used. This catches missing/overlong fill even when the two semantic colors are close, without imposing a larger visual contrast than the design specifies.

The prior coordinate finding is resolved: the sample Y now uses layoutFragmentFrame.minY + typographicBounds.midY, no glyph-origin offset, and explicit bitmap bounds assertions replace clamping. The blank logical line is interior, metadata-backed, and included in the strict four-row gutter count. Fragment-local lower bounds, seam checks, resize growth, and empty-EOF coverage remain. Cumulative diagnostics remain opt-in and content-free; git diff --check 7eb24dd6..4281427b passes and the worktree is clean.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Exact candidate: `4281427b811a4a99c2798375a50a99dbc65d13b4` Cumulative range reviewed: `a07cbb19..4281427b` Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run Verdict: **SOURCE FAIL (P2 edge-color discriminator)** ### P2 — independent `0.25` tolerances can accept the surface as background 1. **Location:** `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift:307-315` and resized duplicate at `:379-386`. 2. **What can break:** a code surface that paints past its intended endpoint can still pass the outside-background assertion, especially in an appearance where the deliberately subtle semantic surface is close to `textBackgroundColor`. 3. **Why likely:** the test accepts the inside pixel when its summed RGB distance from the surface is below `0.25`, and independently accepts the outside pixel when its distance from the background is below `0.25`. It never requires either pixel to be closer to its intended color than to the other semantic color. The production surface is derived by low-fraction blends of control background and separator into text background, so the surface/background distance is appearance-dependent and can fall inside the fixed outside tolerance. In that case a pixel equal to the overlong surface has a background distance under `0.25` and passes. The same overlap exists after resize. 4. **Scoped fix:** retain the existing absolute checks, and add relative discrimination for both samples at both sizes: inside must be closer to `expectedSurface` than to `expectedBackground`; outside must be closer to `expectedBackground` than to `expectedSurface`. Compute the same summed RGB distances already used. This catches missing/overlong fill even when the two semantic colors are close, without imposing a larger visual contrast than the design specifies. The prior coordinate finding is resolved: the sample Y now uses `layoutFragmentFrame.minY + typographicBounds.midY`, no glyph-origin offset, and explicit bitmap bounds assertions replace clamping. The blank logical line is interior, metadata-backed, and included in the strict four-row gutter count. Fragment-local lower bounds, seam checks, resize growth, and empty-EOF coverage remain. Cumulative diagnostics remain opt-in and content-free; `git diff --check 7eb24dd6..4281427b` passes and the worktree is clean.
Author
Owner

Integration status — #9 final assertion still under review

  • Task: /root/block_drag_finish
  • Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb
  • Branch: wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb
  • Current clean SHA: ce2100f0c62a56cb9b4981810facfe540ac094df
  • Candidate 4281427b811a4a99c2798375a50a99dbc65d13b4: SOURCE FAIL P2 from /root/ui_fixes_review_medium.
  • The blank-line bitmap sample Y is now correct. The remaining blocker is that absolute surface/background color tolerances can overlap for subtle semantic colors, allowing an overlong code surface to pass.
  • Required correction: compare relative color distances so the inside sample is nearer the surface color and the outside sample is nearer the background color, before and after resize, while retaining explicit bounds and the existing lower-bound/gutter assertions.
  • No rejected #9 test delta has been integrated. The isolated branch remains clean and retains reviewed #11 diagnostics plus the reviewed #9 diagnostic instrumentation only.
  • Dependency: final combined #9/#11 review and #20 handoff wait for a corrected, reviewed #9 assertion candidate. No build or GUI run.
### Integration status — #9 final assertion still under review - Task: `/root/block_drag_finish` - Worktree: `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` - Branch: `wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` - Current clean SHA: `ce2100f0c62a56cb9b4981810facfe540ac094df` - Candidate `4281427b811a4a99c2798375a50a99dbc65d13b4`: **SOURCE FAIL P2** from `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium`. - The blank-line bitmap sample Y is now correct. The remaining blocker is that absolute surface/background color tolerances can overlap for subtle semantic colors, allowing an overlong code surface to pass. - Required correction: compare relative color distances so the inside sample is nearer the surface color and the outside sample is nearer the background color, before and after resize, while retaining explicit bounds and the existing lower-bound/gutter assertions. - No rejected #9 test delta has been integrated. The isolated branch remains clean and retains reviewed #11 diagnostics plus the reviewed #9 diagnostic instrumentation only. - Dependency: final combined #9/#11 review and #20 handoff wait for a corrected, reviewed #9 assertion candidate. No build or GUI run.
Author
Owner

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish
Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish
Branch: wave16/code-block-polish
State: bounded color-oracle candidate ready for exact review
Base: 4281427b81
Candidate: ab06083da3

Change:

  • Kept the absolute endpoint tolerances for resolved surface and editor background.
  • Added relative checks before and after resize: the inside sample must be closer to the semantic code surface than the background; the outside sample must be closer to the background than the surface.
  • No production code or other mounted assertions changed.

Validation: git diff --check passed. No local build, tests, GUI, or VM run per root ownership rules.

Worker/role: /root/code_block_polish Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/code-block-polish Branch: wave16/code-block-polish State: bounded color-oracle candidate ready for exact review Base: 4281427b811a4a99c2798375a50a99dbc65d13b4 Candidate: ab06083da3fd7e98870310e5999b812263b7db17 Change: - Kept the absolute endpoint tolerances for resolved surface and editor background. - Added relative checks before and after resize: the inside sample must be closer to the semantic code surface than the background; the outside sample must be closer to the background than the surface. - No production code or other mounted assertions changed. Validation: git diff --check passed. No local build, tests, GUI, or VM run per root ownership rules.
Author
Owner

Reviewer: /root/ui_fixes_review_medium
Exact candidate: ab06083da3fd7e98870310e5999b812263b7db17
Cumulative range reviewed: ccea08dcb1e08d2bbab796a9a3b54d766498708c..ab06083da3fd7e98870310e5999b812263b7db17
Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run
Verdict: SOURCE PASS — no P1-P3 findings

The new relative RGB checks resolve the remaining edge-oracle gap at both initial and resized widths: the inside sample must be closer to the semantic code surface than to the editor background, and the outside sample must be closer to the editor background than to the surface. An absent surface or an overlong surface therefore fails even when the two appearance-dependent semantic colors fall within the same absolute 0.25 tolerance.

The cumulative test keeps the corrected fragment-local conversion and lower-bound renderingSurfaceBounds contract, identifies an explicit interior blank logical line, samples at layoutFragmentFrame.minY + typographicBounds.midY without a glyph-origin offset, and asserts that Y is within the one-pixel-per-point cache bitmap instead of clamping. It still requires four logical line starts and visible gutter ink for each, semantic surface fill, continuous fragment joins, growth and endpoint relocation after resize, and the empty-fence vertical extension. Native glyph overhang is allowed without weakening the custom panel endpoint proof.

The cumulative production diagnostic hooks remain guarded before geometry extraction/formatting, emit geometry/line ordinals only, and do not log Markdown, source tokens, or URLs. The rejected cf7c0f87 endpoint behavior is absent. git diff --check 4281427b..ab06083d and ccea08dc..ab06083d pass; the worktree is clean at exact HEAD. Build and mounted runtime evidence remain required before claiming the painter passes.

Reviewer: `/root/ui_fixes_review_medium` Exact candidate: `ab06083da3fd7e98870310e5999b812263b7db17` Cumulative range reviewed: `ccea08dcb1e08d2bbab796a9a3b54d766498708c..ab06083da3fd7e98870310e5999b812263b7db17` Status: source review complete; no build or GUI run Verdict: **SOURCE PASS — no P1-P3 findings** The new relative RGB checks resolve the remaining edge-oracle gap at both initial and resized widths: the inside sample must be closer to the semantic code surface than to the editor background, and the outside sample must be closer to the editor background than to the surface. An absent surface or an overlong surface therefore fails even when the two appearance-dependent semantic colors fall within the same absolute `0.25` tolerance. The cumulative test keeps the corrected fragment-local conversion and lower-bound `renderingSurfaceBounds` contract, identifies an explicit interior blank logical line, samples at `layoutFragmentFrame.minY + typographicBounds.midY` without a glyph-origin offset, and asserts that Y is within the one-pixel-per-point cache bitmap instead of clamping. It still requires four logical line starts and visible gutter ink for each, semantic surface fill, continuous fragment joins, growth and endpoint relocation after resize, and the empty-fence vertical extension. Native glyph overhang is allowed without weakening the custom panel endpoint proof. The cumulative production diagnostic hooks remain guarded before geometry extraction/formatting, emit geometry/line ordinals only, and do not log Markdown, source tokens, or URLs. The rejected `cf7c0f87` endpoint behavior is absent. `git diff --check 4281427b..ab06083d` and `ccea08dc..ab06083d` pass; the worktree is clean at exact HEAD. Build and mounted runtime evidence remain required before claiming the painter passes.
Author
Owner

Final combined diagnostics candidate ready for interaction review

  • Integration task: /root/block_drag_finish
  • Worktree: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb
  • Branch: wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb
  • Base: 3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68
  • Exact candidate: e7a45d7ce1c7302a1513f91745a0e865ff1a5d2c
  • #11 cumulative diagnostics: event-time image fragment geometry plus allocation-free disabled callback, adapted to the current richer ImageInteractionTarget.
  • #9 cumulative diagnostics: opt-in, content-free native painter geometry plus the reviewer-passed mounted bitmap endpoint oracle from ccea08dc..ab06083d.
  • The final #9 test patch has stable patch ID cc576c5729724873fedb279b1314668e933b045a; the integrated and author-final test blobs are both d8c55b84e1ef851bc471adbcf806048dc2befadb.
  • Net files vs base: BlockEditorView.swift, CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift, and EditorImageGeometryTests.swift only.
  • Excluded: rejected intermediate assertion states as commits, image provider/NSLayoutManagerDelegate/assumeIsolated changes, and #12 product repair.
  • Worktree clean; git diff --check passes; no build or GUI run.
  • Gate: exact merged interaction review pending before requesting root authorization to apply onto current central 5a18.
### Final combined diagnostics candidate ready for interaction review - Integration task: `/root/block_drag_finish` - Worktree: `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` - Branch: `wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` - Base: `3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68` - Exact candidate: `e7a45d7ce1c7302a1513f91745a0e865ff1a5d2c` - #11 cumulative diagnostics: event-time image fragment geometry plus allocation-free disabled callback, adapted to the current richer `ImageInteractionTarget`. - #9 cumulative diagnostics: opt-in, content-free native painter geometry plus the reviewer-passed mounted bitmap endpoint oracle from `ccea08dc..ab06083d`. - The final #9 test patch has stable patch ID `cc576c5729724873fedb279b1314668e933b045a`; the integrated and author-final test blobs are both `d8c55b84e1ef851bc471adbcf806048dc2befadb`. - Net files vs base: `BlockEditorView.swift`, `CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`, and `EditorImageGeometryTests.swift` only. - Excluded: rejected intermediate assertion states as commits, image provider/`NSLayoutManagerDelegate`/`assumeIsolated` changes, and #12 product repair. - Worktree clean; `git diff --check` passes; no build or GUI run. - Gate: exact merged interaction review pending before requesting root authorization to apply onto current central `5a18`.
Author
Owner

Reviewer /root/editor_polish_inventory exact source verdict for e7a45d7ce1c7302a1513f91745a0e865ff1a5d2c vs 3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68: PASS, no P1-P3 findings.

The cumulative #9 painter diagnostics remain guarded by CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC == 1. Disabled production drawing performs only the existing static Boolean branch; logging captures geometry/color context only. The final CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift blob is byte-identical to reviewed donor ab06083d, retaining mounted wrapping, blank logical row/gutter ink, live right endpoint, background/surface color discrimination, fragment joins, resize, empty block, and EOF coverage. This is source review only; no build or GUI run was performed.

Reviewer `/root/editor_polish_inventory` exact source verdict for `e7a45d7ce1c7302a1513f91745a0e865ff1a5d2c` vs `3bbb28a6fcf7bac1dae310bd07ea8e7a0ace6b68`: **PASS, no P1-P3 findings**. The cumulative #9 painter diagnostics remain guarded by `CALTERNAL_CODE_DIAGNOSTIC == 1`. Disabled production drawing performs only the existing static Boolean branch; logging captures geometry/color context only. The final `CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift` blob is byte-identical to reviewed donor `ab06083d`, retaining mounted wrapping, blank logical row/gutter ink, live right endpoint, background/surface color discrimination, fragment joins, resize, empty block, and EOF coverage. This is source review only; no build or GUI run was performed.
Author
Owner

Central integration candidate — final review pending

  • Task: /root/block_drag_finish
  • Worktree/branch: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-overnight-combined / wave14/editor-overnight-combined
  • Parent: 5a18daf3e447120b2ace3caefce67bb3fd99322e
  • Exact candidate: da644b0467a96a9d74e199592b6a56f7e7f9c318
  • Applied only the reviewed isolated range 2c3d934e..e7a45d7c: #11 event-time layout probe/allocation guard, #9 native painter diagnostics, and the final reviewer-passed endpoint test oracle.
  • Existing diagnostic bases 5041add2 and 932e17e1 were not reapplied; #12 provider repair at 5a18 remains ancestral.
  • Net vs parent is two files only: BlockEditorView.swift and CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift (127 additions, 9 deletions).
  • Final code test blob remains exact author-reviewed d8c55b84e1ef851bc471adbcf806048dc2befadb; stable patch ID remains cc576c5729724873fedb279b1314668e933b045a.
  • Worktree clean and git diff --check passes. No build or GUI run.
  • Exact central interaction review is active; root is holding compiler/build until its verdict.
### Central integration candidate — final review pending - Task: `/root/block_drag_finish` - Worktree/branch: `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-overnight-combined` / `wave14/editor-overnight-combined` - Parent: `5a18daf3e447120b2ace3caefce67bb3fd99322e` - Exact candidate: `da644b0467a96a9d74e199592b6a56f7e7f9c318` - Applied only the reviewed isolated range `2c3d934e..e7a45d7c`: #11 event-time layout probe/allocation guard, #9 native painter diagnostics, and the final reviewer-passed endpoint test oracle. - Existing diagnostic bases `5041add2` and `932e17e1` were not reapplied; #12 provider repair at `5a18` remains ancestral. - Net vs parent is two files only: `BlockEditorView.swift` and `CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift` (127 additions, 9 deletions). - Final code test blob remains exact author-reviewed `d8c55b84e1ef851bc471adbcf806048dc2befadb`; stable patch ID remains `cc576c5729724873fedb279b1314668e933b045a`. - Worktree clean and `git diff --check` passes. No build or GUI run. - Exact central interaction review is active; root is holding compiler/build until its verdict.
Author
Owner

Reviewer /root/editor_polish_inventory exact central integration PASS, no P1-P3 findings: da644b0467a96a9d74e199592b6a56f7e7f9c318 vs base 5a18daf3e447120b2ace3caefce67bb3fd99322e.

The net is limited to BlockEditorView.swift and CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift; git diff --check is clean. Existing #12 provider/view implementation and EditorImageGeometryTests.swift are blob-identical to the base. The #11 instrumentation remains adapted to the richer ImageInteractionTarget, preserves toolbar/attachment/frame/viewport/URL behavior, and allocates no frame array when disabled. The #9 final mounted code test blob remains byte-identical to reviewed ab06083d. No duplicate base diagnostic declarations were introduced. Source-only review; no build or GUI run.

Reviewer `/root/editor_polish_inventory` exact **central integration PASS**, no P1-P3 findings: `da644b0467a96a9d74e199592b6a56f7e7f9c318` vs base `5a18daf3e447120b2ace3caefce67bb3fd99322e`. The net is limited to `BlockEditorView.swift` and `CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`; `git diff --check` is clean. Existing #12 provider/view implementation and `EditorImageGeometryTests.swift` are blob-identical to the base. The #11 instrumentation remains adapted to the richer `ImageInteractionTarget`, preserves toolbar/attachment/frame/viewport/URL behavior, and allocates no frame array when disabled. The #9 final mounted code test blob remains byte-identical to reviewed `ab06083d`. No duplicate base diagnostic declarations were introduced. Source-only review; no build or GUI run.
Author
Owner

Final central diagnostics handoff — source PASS

  • Task: /root/block_drag_finish
  • Worktree/branch: /Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-overnight-combined / wave14/editor-overnight-combined
  • Parent: 5a18daf3e447120b2ace3caefce67bb3fd99322e
  • Exact tip: da644b0467a96a9d74e199592b6a56f7e7f9c318
  • Reviewer: /root/editor_polish_inventory
  • Verdict: PASS, no P1–P3 findings.
  • Net vs parent is only Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift and Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift; worktree clean and git diff --check passes.
  • #12 EditorImagePresentation, EditorImageControlsTests, and EditorImageGeometryTests blobs are unchanged from 5a18. The richer image target/toolbar behavior and provider repair remain intact.
  • #11 diagnostics collect the exact event-time attachment frames only when the callback is installed; the disabled path allocates no frame array and exposes no source or URL.
  • #9 diagnostics remain opt-in. The final code test blob exactly matches reviewed ab06083d and retains strict fragment endpoint, relative surface/background color, resize, gutter, seam, empty-fence, and EOF assertions.
  • No build or GUI run in this task. Root owns the sole compiler and VM runtime next.
  • Open runtime gaps remain: #9 mounted code painter proof must execute on the exact new build; #11 Quick Look gesture/ownership must be re-run; #12 existing provider Fit/Fill and image-hit runtime failures remain open and were not changed here.
### Final central diagnostics handoff — source PASS - Task: `/root/block_drag_finish` - Worktree/branch: `/Users/kayg/Developer/calternal-app/.worktrees/editor-overnight-combined` / `wave14/editor-overnight-combined` - Parent: `5a18daf3e447120b2ace3caefce67bb3fd99322e` - Exact tip: `da644b0467a96a9d74e199592b6a56f7e7f9c318` - Reviewer: `/root/editor_polish_inventory` - Verdict: **PASS, no P1–P3 findings**. - Net vs parent is only `Sources/CalternalEditor/BlockEditorView.swift` and `Tests/CalternalEditorTests/CodeBlockPresentationTests.swift`; worktree clean and `git diff --check` passes. - #12 `EditorImagePresentation`, `EditorImageControlsTests`, and `EditorImageGeometryTests` blobs are unchanged from `5a18`. The richer image target/toolbar behavior and provider repair remain intact. - #11 diagnostics collect the exact event-time attachment frames only when the callback is installed; the disabled path allocates no frame array and exposes no source or URL. - #9 diagnostics remain opt-in. The final code test blob exactly matches reviewed `ab06083d` and retains strict fragment endpoint, relative surface/background color, resize, gutter, seam, empty-fence, and EOF assertions. - No build or GUI run in this task. Root owns the sole compiler and VM runtime next. - Open runtime gaps remain: #9 mounted code painter proof must execute on the exact new build; #11 Quick Look gesture/ownership must be re-run; #12 existing provider Fit/Fill and image-hit runtime failures remain open and were not changed here.
Author
Owner

Bedtime checkpoint requested by user: finish already active tasks, record results, then stop. No new repair round tonight. No launch or application interaction on kayg@mbp after locking. Build-only work remains agents@mbp; runtime/computer use remains Lume VM.

Frozen combined revision: da644b0467. Exact source/integration review PASS; optimized package compile PASS (31.782 seconds), log hash independently verified. Final Release build/package in progress; desktop stays 3bbb until morning, no desktop launch/install overnight.

#12 exact 5a18 controls: 10 tests executed, 0 failures, rc0. Parent capture delta0 vs provider delta1.8229637444019318 demonstrates native provider Fit/Fill pixels change. #12 product/test blobs unchanged in da644. Native composition/user acceptance remain open.
#9/#11 final diagnostics/test corrections source-reviewed and compiled in da644; final runtime rerun remains a morning follow-up. No code-block or Quick Look fix claim.
#5 exact 19b isolated hosted rename control exited139 after sandbox related-item warning. No matching new IPS. Config audit identifies missing production-equivalent fixture authorization and relocated XCTest runtime as competing hypotheses. Production rename task ownership unchanged; no speculative repair.
#2 remains user-accepted fixed. Other individual issue acceptance gaps remain in master tracker. All implementation/review/QA agents finished; only final Release packaging is active. Root will append artifact receipt and stop.

Bedtime checkpoint requested by user: finish already active tasks, record results, then stop. No new repair round tonight. No launch or application interaction on kayg@mbp after locking. Build-only work remains agents@mbp; runtime/computer use remains Lume VM. Frozen combined revision: da644b0467a96a9d74e199592b6a56f7e7f9c318. Exact source/integration review PASS; optimized package compile PASS (31.782 seconds), log hash independently verified. Final Release build/package in progress; desktop stays 3bbb until morning, no desktop launch/install overnight. #12 exact 5a18 controls: 10 tests executed, 0 failures, rc0. Parent capture delta0 vs provider delta1.8229637444019318 demonstrates native provider Fit/Fill pixels change. #12 product/test blobs unchanged in da644. Native composition/user acceptance remain open. #9/#11 final diagnostics/test corrections source-reviewed and compiled in da644; final runtime rerun remains a morning follow-up. No code-block or Quick Look fix claim. #5 exact 19b isolated hosted rename control exited139 after sandbox related-item warning. No matching new IPS. Config audit identifies missing production-equivalent fixture authorization and relocated XCTest runtime as competing hypotheses. Production rename task ownership unchanged; no speculative repair. #2 remains user-accepted fixed. Other individual issue acceptance gaps remain in master tracker. All implementation/review/QA agents finished; only final Release packaging is active. Root will append artifact receipt and stop.
Author
Owner

/root/title_completion final bedtime build handoff for exact central revision da644b0467a96a9d74e199592b6a56f7e7f9c318 (tree 6b389118016bab48a226205956de13b15df21592). The reviewed #9 diagnostic source is included in a verified Release morning artifact, but its exact mounted VM diagnostic has not run.

Release compilation on agents@mbp passed in 62.508 seconds. Raw build evidence: /Users/agents/Developer/BuildOnly/calternal-preview-evidence/artifacts/20260913T183809Z-da644b0467a9-00031a65; executable SHA-256 1edd96e29065fc70483b122e24552bc2bc5ef87d10c9efd916a55f9d2a81f4a2; result 452d13f6ef2495a0883d58c5c2a34bdede972745ece4f07b7421ba32acfd699d; build log dc520b78a188da1d1ff24e84202434e92f356781317a9d825fce289c82132828; signature log e37b9a751d08c0d419416372cbe03244f01ad7fcf5688d281647e8955ee59ce1.

Immutable morning package: /Users/Shared/CalternalBuilds/da644b0467a9-00031a65/Calternal-da644b0467a9-Release-arm64.zip, SHA-256 c781f08c7c20ce8f97eab389252f28df50f15b583730291ed3d256ebeacbbb2b. Fresh unpack strict codesign and byte-for-byte bundle comparison passed; archive receipt /Users/Shared/CalternalBuilds/da644b0467a9-00031a65/archive-verify.json SHA-256 08b029ef97af3c0898fe4270de73ac2b0b08c92acbf90b5f7ccdb1fc5e45a6f8.

No VM test, desktop install, app launch, or GUI action was performed for this artifact. #9 remains open pending the exact da644b04 mounted code-painter diagnostic and user/performance acceptance.

`/root/title_completion` final bedtime build handoff for exact central revision `da644b0467a96a9d74e199592b6a56f7e7f9c318` (tree `6b389118016bab48a226205956de13b15df21592`). The reviewed #9 diagnostic source is included in a verified Release morning artifact, but its exact mounted VM diagnostic has **not run**. Release compilation on `agents@mbp` passed in 62.508 seconds. Raw build evidence: `/Users/agents/Developer/BuildOnly/calternal-preview-evidence/artifacts/20260913T183809Z-da644b0467a9-00031a65`; executable SHA-256 `1edd96e29065fc70483b122e24552bc2bc5ef87d10c9efd916a55f9d2a81f4a2`; result `452d13f6ef2495a0883d58c5c2a34bdede972745ece4f07b7421ba32acfd699d`; build log `dc520b78a188da1d1ff24e84202434e92f356781317a9d825fce289c82132828`; signature log `e37b9a751d08c0d419416372cbe03244f01ad7fcf5688d281647e8955ee59ce1`. Immutable morning package: `/Users/Shared/CalternalBuilds/da644b0467a9-00031a65/Calternal-da644b0467a9-Release-arm64.zip`, SHA-256 `c781f08c7c20ce8f97eab389252f28df50f15b583730291ed3d256ebeacbbb2b`. Fresh unpack strict codesign and byte-for-byte bundle comparison passed; archive receipt `/Users/Shared/CalternalBuilds/da644b0467a9-00031a65/archive-verify.json` SHA-256 `08b029ef97af3c0898fe4270de73ac2b0b08c92acbf90b5f7ccdb1fc5e45a6f8`. No VM test, desktop install, app launch, or GUI action was performed for this artifact. #9 remains open pending the exact `da644b04` mounted code-painter diagnostic and user/performance acceptance.
Author
Owner

User requested latest build launch this morning. Root installed and launched exact da644b0467 at /Users/kayg/Applications/Calternal.app. Verified archive and executable hashes, strict codesign, normal Quit of old preview, rollback retained, vault text inventory unchanged during replacement. Fresh native AX confirms visible window and previous note with Style inspector restored. Install receipt .agents/desktop-install/da644b04/install-receipt.json. Image controls10/10 prior5a18 with unchanged relevant files; exact-final #9/#11 runtime, user UI/performance and title hosted environment remain open. Preview delivery only; no stable acceptance claim.

User requested latest build launch this morning. Root installed and launched exact da644b0467a96a9d74e199592b6a56f7e7f9c318 at /Users/kayg/Applications/Calternal.app. Verified archive and executable hashes, strict codesign, normal Quit of old preview, rollback retained, vault text inventory unchanged during replacement. Fresh native AX confirms visible window and previous note with Style inspector restored. Install receipt .agents/desktop-install/da644b04/install-receipt.json. Image controls10/10 prior5a18 with unchanged relevant files; exact-final #9/#11 runtime, user UI/performance and title hosted environment remain open. Preview delivery only; no stable acceptance claim.
Author
Owner

Remote preservation checkpoint — 2026-09-14

The following original-worktree candidates are now pushed and exact hashes verified on both Forgejo and GitHub. These are preserved candidates/diagnostics, not a claim of new acceptance; some may already be integrated by cherry-pick or superseded. Use the issue’s existing evidence before choosing changes to resume.

  • wave12/craft-code-block-polish — 82d98e18af8f112f4c3ee44ef3859a45fa35b36b
  • wave16/code-block-polish — ab06083da3fd7e98870310e5999b812263b7db17
  • wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb — e7a45d7ce1c7302a1513f91745a0e865ff1a5d2c

Master #20 contains the resume instructions. No force push; dev remains 1d8f4adf.

Remote preservation checkpoint — 2026-09-14 The following original-worktree candidates are now pushed and exact hashes verified on both Forgejo and GitHub. These are preserved candidates/diagnostics, not a claim of new acceptance; some may already be integrated by cherry-pick or superseded. Use the issue’s existing evidence before choosing changes to resume. - `wave12/craft-code-block-polish` — `82d98e18af8f112f4c3ee44ef3859a45fa35b36b` - `wave16/code-block-polish` — `ab06083da3fd7e98870310e5999b812263b7db17` - `wave17/editor-diagnostics-3bbb` — `e7a45d7ce1c7302a1513f91745a0e865ff1a5d2c` Master #20 contains the resume instructions. No force push; dev remains 1d8f4adf.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
kayg/calternal-macos#9
No description provided.